Richard Gage on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 & His Call for a New Investigation

Auto-generated captions. Wording may contain transcription errors; check the recording for exact statements.

0:01 Live from Miami, Florida, broadcasting around the world. Around the world. You're listening to Patriots Perspective with Christi Tasker. Your news behind the government's facade. Don't fall victim to propaganda or spend another 30 days in the tech goolog. Turn off your tell live vision and just listen. Hear the most mind-opening hours of your life as we interview whistleblowers and real patriots for uncensored truth. Truth. The commie news network and Facebook cannot control the power of Jesus Christ. Therefore, they have no power over us. There aren't enough Vegas strippers to fake check what's coming. Put in your earphones and avoid the tech tyrants. Subscribe to patriotsperspective.com now and see the evidence and action items to help you

0:53 take back your God-given rights, government, and expose Satan and his demons taking up residence in your community. Be sure to hit the like or rumble button and comment to tell us where you're holding the "[Music]" line. Good afternoon. Uh let's see. Let me make sure I've got my mic on. Hi everybody. Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Can you give me a thumbs up if you can hear me? Can you give me a thumbs up if you can hear me? Okay, let's make sure that everybody can hear. Thumbs up if you can hear. Okay, so I'm going to assume everybody can hear me now. And today I have got a guest of all guests.

1:35 I have been waiting for this gentleman, Richard Gage, who is an AIA architect of more than 30 years from the San Francisco Bay area. He is a member of the American Institute of Architects. Yes, that is AIA and founder of the former CEO of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. He is now independent. He along with his courageous wife Gail continue to lead the charge towards the real investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 911. Find more at richard gage 911.org. Mr. Gage became very interested in researching the destruction of the World Trade highrises after hearing the

2:29 startling conclusions of a reluctant 911 researcher David Ray Griffin. Have you guys heard of David Ray Griffin? It was on the radio in 2006 which he launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 911. The organization he founded AE 911 Truth. now numbers more than 3,500 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 911. So, as an architect, he has worked on the most types of building construction, including numerous fireproof steel framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction of documents for a $400 million mixeduse urban

3:19 project with $1.2 million square feet of retail parking structure and midhigh high-rise office space. Although together about 1,200 tons of steel framing. So, please welcome my guest today, Mr. Richard Gage. Richard, welcome to Patriots Perspective. And I'm sorry I jumbled up the intro just a bit, but you can clarify anything that I said incorrectly. That's all good. And thank you, Christie. Awesome to be here with you today on Patriots Perspective. Well, we're grateful to have you. There are so many things that I want to learn from you and and hear and I want my audience to hear what I have known from you for a very long time. And I'm just very grateful to have you on the show. And I

4:07 want everybody to remain open-minded because the number one way we can get to people to expose the truth is number one, ask them how many buildings fell on 911. Most people will only say two. So it's a way to open up a conversation and get things going and they're going to learn about many more buildings that maybe fell that day. Richard, so take it away. Let's let's hear what you want. Particularly this one. um the the building 7. In fact, let's start with that. If you want to share Sure. my screen, I've got it there in the green room for you. Okay. Yes. Let's go.

4:46 Because we don't want patriots perspective viewers to be the last to know about this. Some of you, in fact, most people in the country are completely unfamiliar with the third worst structural failure in modern history. And I'm including architects and engineers in that. This should have been the most studied failure ever. So, please share this information so your friends are not the last to know. In fact, Richard, one of my favorite things is is the other favorite thing is when I ask them how many buildings fell, they always say two. The other favorite thing that I love to ask is, you know, hey

5:25 guys, how much was spent on the investigation for 911? So, why don't you tell my audience what you know or what you what you found as the the cost and the amount of money that we spent on the investigation itself? Well, it was a whole lot less than the amount of money spent on the investigation into the dress that Monica Lewinsky wore during her time with Bill Clinton. $20 million is is all they had. And uh it was kind of like the 911 commission itself. The attorney for the 911 commission, John Farmer, said that they were set up to fail. There was a decision not to tell the American people the truth about what

6:05 really happened at 9/11. So NIST uh is the National Institute of Standards and Technology. And they were tasked by Congress to explain all three collapses to the American people. and they had 10,000 pages, $20 million, but they still didn't get at the evidence that you're going to be seeing today, particularly about World Trade Center 7, that third tower that was destroyed. Wasn't hit by a plane now, mind you. Here it is on the to the left of the Twin Towers. Easily the tallest building in most of our states, but this building seems to have been forgotten about. It's

6:41 actually been swept under the rug quite consciously uh because no plane hit it and yet it went down. Let's talk about it. It's about 100 yards north of the north tower and here it is standing just fine after even during the collapse of both towers. Uh some of the beams and columns actually hit this building, but NIST says this was not a significant factor in the building's collapse. We'll talk about what was, but let's look at the collapse. It happens 7 hours after the Twin Towers came down on 911. So, you see the East Penthouse comes down

7:20 first in an isolated incident and then 6 seconds later, this happens to this building. Now, if you're reflective, you probably say, "I've seen this before. I know what that is." just a pancaking building, which buildings don't typically pancake in anything I've ever seen unless it's a controlled demolition. That's me saying that, Richard. So, feel free to correct me if I'm incorrect and anything. That's exactly like the old hotels in Las Vegas when they come down. And that, you know, and those are controlled demolitions. Let's listen to the official narrative of this building's collapse from Sham Sunder of NIST. While you're working on that, I'll

8:04 tell the audience um something they may want to go back and u one of the very interesting things is I've interviewed a guest. Her name is Michelle Stfonic. And Michelle is from the US Navy and she was the investigator who found all the black ops money in Nairobi, Kenya in 1998. There was a building collapse there as well. They thought that Michelle was in that specific building where she claims that she found the money that was being stored in building 7. So she has her testimonies on congressional record. She has given the testimony many times to various politicians who often refuse to listen to her who pretty much run and

8:47 and don't make theelves available at all when she wants to go and meet with them because she claims that she found the black ops money in from Nairobi, Kenya and that building was also destructed. So her theory is that they destroyed building 7 because it actually had the storage of the papers from they're connected to the Nairobi black ops money. Okay. Well, there's a lot of interesting tenants in the building. If you want to reshare, we'll double check that audio, but uh the tenants included the the IRS, the CIA, the Department of Defense, the Securities and Exchange

9:25 Commission. So, this is not a low security building by any means. Nobody should have gotten into it, right, to place explosives without uh serious approvals. In fact, all three of these buildings were three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon. And so, let's see what uh if you can hear Sham Sunder now. Anyway, he's saying that fires brought these building down. Uncontrolled fires. Well, these are the largest fires for which we have photographic or video evidence of in the building. As you can see, they're few, they're small, they're scattered, and they're actually out about an hour and a half before this building collapses at

10:04 520. They're completely out. So, they could not have caused, as we'll see, the freef fall symmetrical collapse of World Trade Center 7. And we'll just look at this. I mean, look at these buildings that are steel frame fireprotected buildings and and realize that not one of them has ever collapsed in history before or after 911 such as these cases and they're fully engulfed as you can see. So, we haven't lost one of these. So, the building 7 claim that it came down by normal office fires is ludicrous on the face of it. And what does it

10:41 actually look like? Let's compare it to a series of controlled demolitions on the right, building seven on the left. Is there any similarity? Is there enough similarity to warrant an investigation into the possible use of explosives? Especially since it looks exactly like a controlled demolition. I was going to say and even the time frame, the time lapse on the buildings themselves. I mean, obviously, you know, that would have to be analyzed, I'm sure, but the reality is they would not fall the way that they fell, you know. So, for the general public, Richard, I think we should describe for the general public, I I don't know if you've got a slide that's showing what a non-demolition

11:23 building would actually look like. Do you have that slide? Sure do. And uh you will get to that, but on the right you see controlled demolitions here. In fact, it has all the features of a controlled demolition. The hypothesis of controlled demolition should have been the first hypothesis that NIST looked at in seriousness to find out what happened to this building. Instead, it was scrapped and put 10 years later into their frequently, very frequently asked questions. Yeah. Let's look at these one at a time real quick. Is there a sudden onset of destruction near the base of the building, which is what you do with controlled demolitions? Listen to Dan Rather.

12:05 Uh Dan Rather is saying destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down. He's using his intuition is what he's doing. And yeah, that seems we should all be doing that. But he never mentioned after 9/11 this building's collapsed. In fact, the media, it's only been on the media uh at most two times uh shown this should again been the most studied structural failure ever because again, no plane hit this building. No normal office fires have ever brought down a steel frame fireprotected building in history. So, you know, firefighters go into these buildings all the time to put out these fires. I don't mean like every day, but there are a lot

12:49 of examples, maybe a hundred in history of high-rise fires. They are not afraid to go into these buildings to put out these fires. That's what they do. But all of a sudden now with a few small scattered fires, the building can fall suddenly and straight down as you see here into its own footprint. That's right. So for our general audience out there, so if you I want you guys to think logically, okay? So if you've got an acre of land, you can't impede on other people's acreage. So that's the reason they need to do controlled demolitions because a building if it weren't controlled it would possibly

13:27 fall into a different plot of land. So think about your neighbors when they think about even a tree. Okay? So typically your neighbors have to get permission when they're going to cut down a tree because some of the tree limbs might fall into your yard, you know. So those are basic things that if we all think logically, we would be able to, you know, just realize that, you know, some of the things that are parallel and natural just don't make sense here. Exactly. And and how do they do that? I mean, you you hit it dead on there, Christie. There's 80 columns in this building. Each of them are is capable of carrying three to five times

14:07 the load above them normally. So, how do you bring a building down symmetrically? You have to remove all the core columns first and then followed by the perimeter columns about a second later and repeat that pattern on each floor. Then you might have a chance of this building falling symmetrically into its own footprint. So, what does that mean? That means that not one of these 80 columns on any floor gave any resistance because this building's falling at freefall as we'll see. So these are the fires that are said to have caused that symmetry. I mean give me a break. This

14:54 is intuitive. A child can figure this out. Those fires could not have brought that building down. And yes, physicists have clocked the speed of this building and it falls as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky. Again, no resistance from any of the 80 columns in the building. This is finally acknowledged by NIST, by the way, in their report which came seven years later in 2008. They acknowledge the freef fall of this building for a third of its 7second fall. the rest of it was darn near freef fall. So what does that mean? Well, it means something happened

15:36 to those golems, right? How do you remove columns instantly so that they're not giving any resistance? Well, NIST does not acknowledge this obvious implication of their admission of freef fall after denying it for seven years, by the way. So where did the columns go? This is pretty important. We have the total dismemberment of the columns so that we end up a 47story momentresisting steel frame building where the beams and columns are rigidly welded one to the other in a significant portion of these columns reduced to six stories. It's like a house of cards is what we're talking about here. This

16:21 couldn't happen in any kind of a natural collapse. You asked about natural collapses. You certainly have a building that's damaged such as these in the earthquakes brought these buildings over and they fall to the path of least resistance. They fall over as you mentioned over. Correct. They do not pancake or even a portion of them will fall and not the rest because you can't get every single beam to fall at once and one does not pull down another as some people might think. It may pulled down a few floors but not all. Is that correct, Richard? Yeah, it's not completely symmetrical as we have here.

17:02 It's not at freefall. There's resistance from the few from the many remaining columns that are still vertical and providing resistance, but not if they're not cut out. If they were cut out, we'd hear witnesses that heard sounds of explosions like this emergency worker. a sound of a clap of thunder, a shock wave ripping through the building, windows busting out, and then the building came down. This is Daryl, a medical student uh interviewed that evening after the collapse of this building on 1010 Winds Radio in New York City. Or Kevin McPaden who's saying, "You heard explosions like baboom. It's like a distinct sound. It's not like when they're compression boom

17:52 boom boom like floors falling on each other and collapsing. This is boom and you heard felt the rumble in the ground almost like he wanted to grab onto something. To me I knew that was an explosion. He's very clear. And this gentleman Bill Rosati standing two blocks away and I just seen a big flash and then I seen the building coming down and people just running everywhere. There's witnesses of explosions, but NIST denies that there's any and and there are more than these as well. What kind of evidence do we have in the aftermath of the building that might lead us to what caused these explosions

18:32 or these columns to be removed? Well, FEMA provides it in their May 2002 building performance assessment team report, a metallurgical examination of this steel. What do they find? Never before observed. Utactic reactions, intergranular melting, turning of a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese like you see in this piece of World Trade Center 7 steel. Guess what? Fires don't do this to steel. Office fires, especially these are maybe five or 600°. Sometimes they get up to a,000°. It takes 2800 degrees to begin to melt steel. That's like four times the temperature minimum of what these office fires could have been gotten to. Rapid oxidation.

19:25 Sulfidation. They don't know where the sulfur came from. Liquid iron. That's molten iron. By the way, that's exceeding 3,000 degrees. sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel and that's exactly what they produce what they document what they find and this is the FEMA report before NIST got into the act took over the investigation throughout this metallurgical examination and completely obscured it steel members in the debris pile appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperature, says the re author of the FEMA report, Dr. Jonathan Barnett. There's a problem here. It takes 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel.

20:19 So, steel was evaporated and yet office fires are an eighth maybe of those temperatures and at most a quarter of those temperatures. Well, here is the evaporated steel documented by Professor Abalhazani Ozel, a structural engineer from UC Berkeley. I saw melting of girders at the World Trade Center. He's freaked out. He doesn't know what can cause it. We see it. Molten metal dripping out of the crab claw excavator. And we can tell because of the physics of molten materials what their temperature is. We're exceeding 2500 degrees. Proof is in this picture. What are some of the only things, Richard, that would make the metal get that temperature? Let's find out. Okay.

21:12 Because that's evidence of ignited incendiaries. It can only be. And we're going to find out what incendiaries are. But there's more evidence of ignited incendiaries in the dust itself. These reports, the particle atlas of the World Trade Center dust in 2005, published by the US Geological Survey also finds billions of what? Previously molten. That's 2800 degrees minimum Fahrenheit. That's iron. We haven't used iron in our skyscrapers for a hundred years. Yes, there's iron in steel in a lot of it, but it's an alloy. It's not elemental iron like we see in these iron microsphheres. And they're spherical.

22:02 Let's see how they get spherical. First, estimates of up to four tons of these spheres. Many of the samples, 6%. They don't know what they are. I mean, where they came from. They know exactly what they are. They they can't figure it out. The EPA that's Deutsch Bank. What did Deutsch Bank have to do with with that? So on the screen, this is an example. This is bank buildings. Yes. This is a sample of the of one of the many samples from the RJ Lee group who also did studies on the World Trade Center dust

22:37 uh finding up to 6% of these samples in the Deutsche Bank because the dust went everywhere from river to river across lower Manhattan including well it also caused cancer and a lot of the firemen and a lot of the first responders and even the survivors as well and we have additional answers. for that as well. But the EPA says, "Hey, we don't know what these spheres are, but they're ubiquitous." So, they're a signature component of the World Trade Center dust. Unless, in other words, it's not even World Trade Center dust unless it has all of these spheres, which we don't

23:14 know where they came from, then we can't imagine. Well, here's a a controlled experiment with the incendiary thermite. Thermite is an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. We saw what look like sparks, but what we realize is that they are liquid molten iron droplets, the signature of thermite, and they fall into the pan and they cool and they become previously molten iron microsphheres. And yes, that is found when a liquid is aerosolized like this, it turns itself into spheres. So under explosive conditions, even molten iron would have the the properties associated with that because of the surface tension of

24:02 liquid. Could that explain what's toasting the tops of these cars all around the World Trade Center? Is there any other answer, possible answer in the official narrative or otherwise that it can explain in this very high heat event the toasting of the tops of these cars? Well, Richard, this may be a theory, but obviously we've just seen something similar like crazily like this in La Hana in Hawaii. Like, is this something that you think could be associated as well? I mean, anything? It's possible. I haven't researched Lahina. I know it's very fishy. There's a whole kinds of problems in Lahina, including the

24:43 devastated cars that weren't even near burnable material. So, that's got to be a topic of research that others are doing and have done, but it's beyond the scope of of my speculation at this point. Well, what I would like to do, because I know I and I said that because I know our audience when they're looking, they're they've got to be thinking that because that's just what it reminded me of, right? So, what I would like to do is make sure that we get you on a panel with some of those people from Lahina to see if we can put some of the information together and

25:16 also the Champlain Towers so that you could give feedback there in relation to the the manager of Champlain Towers. Yeah. Will he come on the program? I heard I mentioned that. Yeah. He's a free bird now. So, he can they have to stay silent for so long and now he's he's free again. So, so is he discussing, for those of you who don't know, we're talking about the collapse of the hotel towers uh in Surfside building. Yep. Surfside, Florida. Yep. Is he questioning the official narrative? I don't want to say anything. I would like to let him speak for himself because I don't know what he's going to say. So, all right, let's have that discussion. I'm looking forward to

25:56 that. Well, that was all evidence of ignited thermite. And by the way, we're just doing a onehour overview. I have much more depth on our website richardgage911.org with uh in fact the documentary 911 explosive evidence experts speak out that I made which includes 40 high-rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, chemists, physicists, control demolition experts, all laying out this evidence. But let's look for evidence of unignited thermite in the dust because a team of eight international scientists led by Neil's Herro in Copenhagen, they were given seven independently collected samples like the one from this apartment across the street from the South Tower,

26:41 Janette McKinley. Her windows blew in because of the explosiveness of the Twin Towers and and filled her apartment with dust. Well, in every dust sample, they found these chips uh that look like paint. primer paint. And curiously, what is that? I was asking what you you had already answered by the time you probably heard me ask. So those are paint chips. They look like paint chips. So they're dual layered. They're red on one side, gray on the other. And these are real curious because they're attracted to a magnet. So uh they have a high iron content. Well, they get real curious. What What is What is all this iron doing in there? Why are they attracted to a magnet? They look at the

27:24 red layer very carefully with X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy and what do they find? The ingredients of thermite. Iron oxide and aluminum powder. Iron oxide is essentially rust aluminum powder. This should not be in the paint chips. Obviously fluid applied because it's dual layered. So they get real curious. They zoom in 50,000 times with an electron microscope. What do they find? iron oxide crystals and aluminum platelets that are a thousand times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. This is very high tech stuff. It is set in a matrix of organic material, oxygen, silica, carbon.

28:09 Organic material is what they put in TNT to expand rapidly into gases and knock things over. That's high energy explosives like C4 and RDX, which is how you typically bring down a building in a controlled demolition. Here we have an incendiary, which works by means of heat, 4,000 degree temperatures, as we saw the evidence for in incendiaries and at the World Trade Center. So, it appears that the the incendiary has been engineered to become more explosive. This stuff is not made in a cave in Afghanistan. Well, and also Richard, and would it wouldn't this have burned up those passports that were laying on top of the rubble? It might have. There's lots of

28:52 paper besides the passports though on top of the rubble. So, I don't give them any particular weight. It is curious that the FBI, you know, finds them right away and and links the Patis who are the alleged hijackers who probably weren't even on the planes because the planes were probably drones, military outfitted aircraft that could fly at those speeds at sea level whereas civilian aircrafts couldn't according to other researchers. That's a whole rabbit hole we could connect you up. Very odd. I mean, I I just wanted to remind my audience that those the passports were supposedly

29:29 found in the midst of all of this where buildings, you know, was so hot that it disintegrated these buildings, but yet passports survived that were supposedly in the plane with the perpetrators who carried out the plane flights that we were told were plane flights, right? So they take this material and they put it in a heater, a differential scanning calerimeter. And at about 800° F, they ignite. Well, what do you think they produced when they ignited? By the way, just them igniting at that temperature producing a lot more energy is evidence of a thermitic response, not paint. But what do they produce also? They produce molten iron microspheres.

30:18 with the same chemical signature as the molten iron microspheres produced at the World Trade Center and studied by the US Geological Survey. So you see, we know exactly where all those molten iron microsphheres came from. The EPA didn't know, the USGS didn't know, RJ Lee didn't know, but we know it's proven they they're produced from these red gray chips of nanoothermite. So they conclude in the 24-page peer-reviewed paper that the red layer is active unreacted thermmitic material incorporating nanotechnology in a highly energetic pyrochnic or explosive material and it's found in all the dust samples. This is documented in a 24-page peer-reviewed paper in the Bentham Open

31:06 Chemical Physics Journal. It stands uncontested. Nobody's come forth to contest this material and and produce their own peer-reviewed paper on the subject. That's how it works in science. You get a peer-reviewed paper, somebody else doesn't agree, they produce their own. That hasn't been done. This is one of 60 exhibits, this peer-reviewed paper in the film 911 crime scene to courtroom that we are in postedit now making. We filmed it in Washington DC. Mick Harrison and I, the litigation director of the lawyers committee for 911 inquiry, will have this film out in spring. a series actually a couple of dozen episodes for the grand jury

31:48 specifically to which it has it will be provided as a film to supplement the 60 exhibits which has already been submitted to the US attorney in lower Manhattan. So this film uh can be co-produced by you Christie and particularly your your wonderful audience. Uh we do need assistance completing this film. So that's uh Well, and also Richard, I was going to ask you I was going to ask you um obviously we talked and before we went on air about me being in marketing, have you thought of doing some prepaid like screenings so that we can screen this in different different theaters and basically be able to like screen it a number of times so

32:33 that each local audience can go to their movie theater to say, "Hey, we want to screen this in your theater." and then have you for a talk if you're available because this would be amazing all of that. I would love to do that. You bet. So, if you guys are interested in attending that or hosting one, make sure you comment and make sure you tag Mr. Gage in the comments. Okay. Well, you could go to the website. Is the Is the website the same, Richard? Richard Gage911.org. Okay. So, that you have a link there for the movies, right? For the movie itself.

33:06 Okay. Perfect. The movie's not made yet, but to learn more about the movie. You bet. And to donate. We we very much uh appreciate and need your uh contributions to to continue not to continue but to bring it to fruition and develop those screenings as you mentioned we will be doing. Well, there's no better way to wake up your neighbors. Wake up your neighbors. And I'll say this, start with your firemen and your police because when they start to they realize like there's no way this happened. Okay. So that's one of the things I've started doing is every fire,

33:39 every police I run into whether they, you know, some of them already know, they've already found the information on their own. Others have not. So I would say start with that in your own neighborhoods. If we all do that, if we actually just tell three police officers, three firemen in our neighborhood, you'd be surprised how quickly the world is going to wake up because trust me, they they're talking. Yes, they do talk. And so we have to ask ourselves if these features of control demolition were all in place with regard to building seven, none of which by the way can be created by fire, much any of them, let alone all of them. Is it

34:18 possible that these features and more could be applicable at the Twin Towers of control demolition? Turns out, yeah. I mean, just looking at it here, we have the uh south tower on the left, the north tower on the right. Uh they're completely identical. First of all, that's a dead giveaway because we have asymmetrical damage from the fires, the planes, and yet we have complete symmetry with upward outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying structural steel sections weighing 4 and 8 tons laterally ejected at 80 m an hour, landing 600 ft in every direction. This is a very explosive event as we'll see, but it begins with a sudden onset of destruction which looks

35:07 more like an implosion just like building 7 in the first 3 seconds. It's standing still and then all of a sudden it's a sudden just like building 7 straight down uniformly symmetrically. There's a little bit of a lean in the south tower and but essentially it is a fairly symmetrical collapse. Now, NIST tells us that this is the upper section drives the rest of the building down to the ground and then destroys itself. This is the crush down crush up theory provided to NIST by Zidenic Bazant from Chicago Northwestern University. But this is not what we see in any of the photographs or videos. There's no section driving the rest of the building down to the ground. If if it were the case, it would be destroyed itself.

35:56 Actually, that's exactly what happens. It's like a Volkswagen running into a Mac truck. Who wins, right? The Mac truck wins. The the lower part of the structure is the strongest part of the structure. Doesn't matter if we drop the Volkswagen on to the Mac truck. The lightest, weakest part of the structure. 3/8 inch thick steel for instance. At the top of the structure can't possibly destroy the heavier, cold, hard intact steel, which is virtually solid steel. at the bottom 52 in by 22 in in these core columns. So then we have to look and say, well, what does it look like?

36:34 Well, World Trade Center 1 on the left looks more like a volcanic eruption in the Tongan Sea in 2009. Again, molten solid objects ejected laterally, trailed by thick white smoke clouds. We'll come to those first. Let's listen to the first responders because now Graham McQueen has identified 186 of them witnesses of explosions like this one. We felt the ground shake. You could see the tower sway and then it just came down again and again. You're going to see this specific order of events. All of a sudden, the ground just started shaking. I felt a train running under my feet. The next thing we know, we look up

37:19 and the tower is collapsing. shook my bones shortly before the first tower came down. I remember feeling the ground shaking. Heard a terrible noise and then debris just started flying everywhere. N tells us no that what they're hearing is the sound of a building collapsing. Sorry, they're very specific. I saw a flash flash at the lower level of the building. That's not where the collapse is. This is way down below the so-called collapse. You know, like when they demolish a building, with each popping sound, it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building. Then it would just go all the way around the building on both sides.

37:58 Saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15. Again, that's way down low in the building. He saw six of these brief flashes accompanied by a crackling sound before the towers collapsed. I saw low-level flashes. I saw flash, flash, flash. And then it looked like the building came down. You ever see professional demolition like certain floors uh they set charges and you hear pop pop pop. When I heard that frigin noise that's when I saw the building coming down an explosion by a paramedic. It's important to know these are by paramedics. These are by eyewitnesses.

38:40 These are by people who know and have seen and who have gone to the rescue for people on some and they were recorded within a month after 911 also. So that's uh critically important as well to to to realize. Uh there was an explosion in the south tower one floor under another when it hit about the fifth floor. I fig it was a bomb because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing. seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. Seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt. All these explosions, the building was blowing out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops, you know. You heard the pops of

39:19 the building. I thought the terrorist planet explosive somewhere in the building. That's how loud it was. A crackling explosive and another loud boom at the upper floors. And then there are series of smaller explosions which appeared to go completely around the building at the upper floors and another loud earthshattering blast with a large fireball that blew out more debris, the lower level of the building. You know, like when they demolish a building. That's what I thought I saw. Do you see any flashes? He said, "Yes, I thought it was just me." He said, "No, I saw them, too." Everybody at that point still thought

39:59 these buildings were blown up. So I was fully expecting anything else to blow up. You were there when the planes hit. No, I was there when the building exploded. You mean when it fell down? No, when it exploded. He's very clear about this not being a collapse, right? Well, again, how do we bring a building straight down? We We have to take out the columns. And that's what we're seeing in the south tower. It actually begins to tip. In fact, it tips at 22°. So, we have asymmetrical damage from this part of the building which is falling off. Asymmetrical damage from the planes, asymmetrical damage from the

40:39 fires. How in the world do we get complete symmetrical damage all the way around? Just like the firefighters described, each face of the building and hearing pop pop all the way down. In fact, we can zoom in on the lower leading corner of these and see for ourselves in this looped video dozens of individual explosions. This is not energy weapons. This is not mini nukes going off. These are individually pre-placed explosives in the perimeter of the building. It's plain to see. In fact, if we look at the isolated explosive ejections, which is an uncharacteristic for sure feature of control demolition,

41:31 we have them 20 stories down, six uh 40 stories down below the zone of destruction here, even 60 stories down below the zone of destruction. There's no accounting whatsoever in the official narrative of these early detonations, if you will, is what they can only be. And we see these squibs going off which we will also discuss on the left side of the south towers destruction. A dozen individual isolated explosive ejections coming out of the left side of this building all at once. Essentially destroying the structure such that it doesn't fall off the building. it drops

42:14 back into it, settles in because it's not a rigid body anymore acting against the rigid body below. It just kind of melts into it. So, we're told that this upper section drove the rest of the building down, but none of the photos, none of the videos show an upper section after 3 seconds driving anything down to the ground. We would see it in the photos and the videos. It would have crushed these few remaining core columns which stand 1,000 ft in the air after the structural steel frame around it has been dismembered by explosions and then it has an explosion and you can see uh

42:54 the top of it descending frame by frame through the dust which has been shaken off of it. Well, it just doesn't even go with architecture or engineering principles, scientific principles as a whole. Like none of this seems to to go with the theory, you know, the theories that I'm going to say the news media gave us on 911 and since. Absolutely. It doesn't go at all. And if you look at the speed of the collapse of the twin towers as clocked by physics teacher David Chandler, uh you can see and he's proven that it falls at near freef fall acceleration in this case 2/3 of freefall acceleration which means what?

43:36 It's getting faster and faster and faster every second. That's the definition of acceleration. It's not a uniform speed. It's gaining speed through what? threw 80,000 tons of structural steel beneath the point of jet plane impacts. More steel here than on the facade of this building than there is glass. This is before the aluminum cladding has been put on. It should have slowed it down. That's the whole purpose. This was three to five times stronger than it needed to be. It's an incredible structure. Yeah. I was going to say if you're looking on your screen, Rich, will you go back one slide because I wanted everybody to notice on the right hand go back one

44:20 more or forward one more. I'm sorry. No, one more. The other way I apologize. Yeah, look on the right hand side of your screens everybody. Look how thick that is even from a distance. Okay, you can see that there is so much more metal than there was window. So that's one of the theories that I know a lot of people are constantly, you know, but just if you just look, you'll see it's almost impossible. The core columns are at mid height 36 in by 16 in and they're 2 in thick. As I mentioned earlier, down at the bottom, they're 52 in x 22 in and

44:58 almost solid steel. Incredibly strong buildings. But look at the lateral ejection of these perimeter structural steel sections. These are 14inch x 14inch square steel tube columns that have been ejected 300 to 500 and even 600 ft in every direction impaling themselves on sky skyscrapers all around them. How does gravity work down? What's going on here? Let's see. We can see these freely flying structural steel sections again. Four and eight tons each laterally ejected. Look at this one. Whoa. Back two. Forward two. Back two. It starts out horizontal. Some massive explosive force has ejected this steel

45:50 beam laterally and then gravity begins to take over and you get about a 45 degree angle here. trailing thick white smoke clouds. We'll come back to that. Well, actually, we may not because we already discussed that incendiaries, both ignited and unignited, forensic evidence of incendiaries have been shown and demonstrated already. That that evidence applies to the twin towers as well. And because steel is not flammable, as I mentioned, uh, steel doesn't even begin to soften until 1,200 degrees. Doesn't begin to melt until 2800° or 3,000° F. And yet, we have the ends of the beams on fire. How would that happen? It can't happen by office fires. Can't happen by

46:43 jet fuel. By the way, jet fuel only burns 600 degrees Fahrenheit. No, no hotter than office fires in open air, which is the condition we had here at the point of the plane impacts. There's enough energy in this hurling of 4 ton structural steel section to hurl a 200lb cannonball three miles. We have a huge problem in the official narrative. By the way, if a 100,000 tons of steel framing has been distributed 5 to 600 feet in every direction outside the footprint of the towers, as we can see on the upper left, uh there's there's only maybe a three, four, fivetory pile of steel at the bottom. Have to ask ourselves, what's

47:32 crushing the building? My gosh, this is not the steel. It's not there. It's well outside the footprint. In fact, it's 1,400 foot diameter all about the 200 foot square building. It's well beyond. So, I've always wondered this. Do you do you think that they overplayed the the amount of materials it was actually going to take to bring those buildings down? Because it's not typical to bring a building that large down to begin with. I don't know. I'm sure they put in enough to make sure that it would come down and it certainly did. I mean, they

48:10 did an exceptional job for putting explosives in an inhabited building. And how would they have done that? Well, perhaps in the elevator modernization, which was going on the nine months prior to 911, the largest elevator modernization in the world, ACE elevator had this contract. They had 85 employees in the building. They fled on or before the time the planes hit the building. It was quite a scandal documented by USA Today. So we want an investigation of ACE elevator. They came out of nowhere to get this contract from Otis elevator who had installed and had been maintaining the elevators for the life of this building. And all of a sudden you have this rogue group who had

48:52 immediate access to the elevator hoistways which is immediately adjacent to the core columns and buildings in the area. So, could that have been the operation where explosives were placed causing steel to be laterally ejected and now causing this floors to be missing? On the left, we don't see 110 floors each an acre in size stacked up. We don't see 50. We don't see 10. We don't even see one of those floors. On the right, you see a real gravitational collapse. Like you said earlier, Christie, a pancake collapse. You see pancakes, right? Yes. All right. All that is completely missing in the

49:35 towers. So the concrete is missing. In fact, there it is. That's where the concrete is. It's being pulverized in midair. All the photos, all the videos show all the concrete, 90,000 tons of it pulverized to a fine particle average size 100 microns. That's like baby powder. Yes. That's an incredible force to pulverize all that concrete. And it covers lower Manhattan from river to river as I mentioned in a 3inch thick blanket. That's where the concrete is. If that's where the concrete is, is I'm sorry to interrupt you, Richard. I apologize. I think we have a delay. I was going to say one of the things that is very interesting too is OSHA you know

50:27 concrete silica is extremely dangerous to workers and everything. So just imagine this is like this doesn't even compare with concrete silica like so much so that this is I don't even think anything like this would be in an OSHA manual which protects workers or anyone building or anyone around the area. So technically, if they were to ever come clean with this investigation and we were to actually get a real investigation, they're technically putting everyone with in New York City at liberty with even the breathing aspect of this dust. Absolutely. And nanoothermite produces nanoarbon tubes which are found in the lungs of the of the deceased. Or was that the living? It may be both. in one technical paper uh

51:18 that's been peer- reviewviewed and published. So the the inference the strong inference is that this was produced by the nanotechnology associated with super thermite which we found evidence of nanoothermite they call it also but in terms of the concrete you mentioned it is in a fine powder all about lower Manhattan so it wasn't available to crush the building either well what's crushing the building this is easily threearters of the weight of the building is the concrete and the steel And all of that weight was used as a mass above the point of jet plane impacts in the calculations by Zenic

52:00 Bazant of Chicago Northwestern University in an attempt to prove how the upper part drove the rest of the building down to the ground. So it's not even available. It's out here. This is very clear. you can figure this out anybody that this is fraud by NIST upon uh the American people and the scientific people and academics uh in engineering and architecture. It's a complete bamboozle. So because we have all 10 key characteristic features and some very uncharacteristic features as well of controlled demolition which is evidence of direct uh direct evidence of destruction with explosives. Fire doesn't create any one of these

52:45 features, let alone all of them with additional circumstantial corroborative evidence and testimony that some of which we've had time to look at today. The rest we have to find on our our documentary 911 explosive evidence experts speak out is proof of controlled demolition. A body of proof that uh here's that video on the left that you want to see at richardgage911.org. "[Music]" Additional videos have been very powerfully proving uh that building 7 was a controlled demolition. And again, all of this evidence is going into the film 911 crime scene to courtroom. An unprecedented film series taking hard

53:29 evidence of 9/11 crimes to court. Now, one of the things that I'm concerned about is getting a real investigation. How do we do that? We have to be uh active because the the the mainstream media is not doing this for us. The government is not doing this for us. They have fed us the the narrative that is false and fraudulent of this false flag operation which is designed to get us into war which it did in Afghanistan and Iraq. And so uh we know what happened in those places. complete disasters under false pretenses. So, what do we do when they've got all the money, they've got

54:17 the guns, they've got the pulpit in the mainstream media to get the public's attention and to produce their propaganda. What do we have? We have millions of us in the 9/11 truth movement. We are uh you might say compared to them, we are the small domino here. They are the big domino. But as you'll see in this video, a small domino h can have a mighty effect when working together with many other small dominoes. Watch what can happen. That's seven dominoes. If we have 29 dominoes, the tallest one that was set 13 dominoes. If we had 29 dominoes, the biggest one would be the height of the Empire State Building. So we acting

55:07 together in unison. For instance, telling two other people about this evidence and asking them to tell two other people about this evidence all of a sudden acts like the small dominoes working together as a team and overcoming insurmountable odds. That's what I want to encourage people to do so that we can get a real investigation. If people just sit on this evidence and do nothing, that big domino will never fall. In fact, we'll all be enslaved in a deep uh state totalitarian government. And that's what we're heading toward rapidly. That is correct. And and Mr. Gage, because I know it's not easy, especially being one of the first people out with truth. And

55:56 I really want my audience to contact their local congressmen and request that they hear you on congressional record because this needs to be heard on congressional record along with Michelle Stefonic's information as well regarding building seven because was it tied together? We will never know if we do not have a proper investigation on both. So, how can we ever expect there to be an investigation? Well, number one, we cannot sit silent. We We have to gather. We have to gather. There has to be some brave congressman or brave senator out there who is not going to shut up about

56:41 it, who will ask for this to go on the agenda and for it to be a congressional record. Some of them are now deceased, had already gone Congress, had gone before our Senate and discussed these some of the very same things and begged for money and begged for just the money for them to survive. Quickly forget very quickly in this country, we want to forget about where we are, where we've been, and we've allowed the fear-mongers to continue to enslave us. And so we do have a choice. I have found that 9/11 is a great way to wake up your

57:24 neighbor by saying again the basic things. How many buildings fell that day? Start with the basics. How many buildings fell that day? They're going to say two. And you're going to say, ""Well, what if I can prove to you that there's three? Would you be willing to look at it?" Yes, of course. You know, and you send them the the links to Mr." Gage's website. Let them watch what they will watch. They'll come back to you. Trust me, they will. They're going to be like, "Oh my gosh, I watched that." And you're like, "Yeah, I know. I was, you know, kind of alarmed when I first saw it." Listen, it's very hard. I know,

57:52 especially if you're like me and you and Mr. Gage and you've been at this for a long time. Um, and I'm not trying to equate that. I've been investigating this for a long time, but you know, just knowing the fact of an untruth that we've been told and we've believed the media narrative. And listen, there's much much more that he has on his website in terms of the specific timeline. So I want to encourage you guys all to go through and look at even the timeline. Look at what the newscasters were saying because you can

58:22 only lie to a certain extent without coming out and naturally organically telling the truth. So go on look find whatever you think your neighbor might be interested. But I'm just saying just don't be prepared to get in a battle with them. Help them with one little dose at a time. Sometimes I feel like we want to be like a fire hose with our neighbors and people that you know who are just waking up to the truth and we want to like get it all out at once. But I do find that the 9/11 is a great way to, you know, kind of put them all together. And then the next thing I

58:56 typically do is show them that um George Bush, his brother was over the security of 911 just weeks before these buildings collapsed and then the elevator, you know, went underneath a different contract. That's usually how I get to the architects, Mr. Gage. I usually say, "Well, you know, they changed elevator companies like nine months before. Shouldn't we be concerned about that?" and they're like, "Ah, they did." You know, so there's basic little things that you just have to pick and choose because, you know, it is concerning. And the other way to get to the firemen is showing the firemen on congressional

59:33 record basically saying this is not normal or just showing those quotes, you know, just show all the quotes together, you know. So think about it and you can take screenshots, you can back this video up, take screenshot of what Mr. Gage showed us. So that way you can take little by little and just red pill your neighbors. Red pill, blue pill, whatever you want to give them, whichever way it goes. But they do need to find out the truth and we do need to wake up to this fast because these are the same people that according to Michelle Stefonic have

1:00:08 taken the black ops money and that was what supposedly was in building 7 and that's what they're going to try to hide it with. the new world order central banking system. She's tied everything together. So, I'll have her back on so that you guys can hear, you know, the connectivity. And then, Mr. Gage, I don't know if you after you hear her, maybe both of you might come on cuz she might be able to provide a little bit more insight to what she knows maybe was inside the building that you may be able to confirm or otherwise. I don't know if you've been on the interior or not, but it's it's pretty interesting all on its

1:00:40 own. But I want to thank you and your wife for being here. Yep. Thank you for being here. Thank you for your research. Is there any other closing thoughts that you want to give my audience? No, I think we covered it and I'm grateful to be here. I just hope I have impressed upon um each of you the imperative to do something with this material. Talk to two other people. Ask them to talk to two other people. Show them this podcast. And if they have more time, the 2-hour presentation available on our website, richardgage911.org. It's called 911

1:01:24 explosive evidence experts speak out because we've assembled 40 high-rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, chemists, physicists, control demolition experts. They all lay out the evidence even more clearly than I have here today. Well, I thank you and thank you for creating the movie as well. I very much look forward to seeing it. We'll be hosting an airing. So, if you're interested in getting that information, make sure that you do sign up for patriots perspective.com. Also, go to richardgage911.org and sign up. So that way you can either if you have organizations, I highly recommend that you go ahead and start contacting your

1:02:04 theaters, scheduling a movie preview, and then maybe there's a way for us to go on and prepay for that preview to help Mr. Gage be able to finish the production of the film as it is. I hope so. So, God bless you everybody. And remember, love your neighbor as yourself. God bless you. Remember, take action. Take action. Don't let big tech win. Share this video with a friend now. Most importantly, do unto others as you would have others do unto you.