New Zealand mortality data: peak prosperity’s January 2022 commentary

Transcript recovered from the original video captions. Automatic captions may contain recognition errors.

Original source recording

This recovered caption export does not contain reliable timecodes.

[Music] hello everyone Dr Chris Martinson here and today we're going to be using a slightly different format and style than maybe you've seen before today it's just my voice and the slides I am on the road at the moment and just unable to be in my normal Studio environment but I really wanted to get you this presentation out episode 43 uh lies lies the injuries are real I'll let you fill in the blanks what the injuries are about and because you know there's certain things I can't and I can't talk about so let's start here there was a really incredible

article that came out from the hatchard report that's the hatchardreport.com you can see the link down there below of course as always I put all the links out in the comments and description below this this is a report that came out on December 17th and it's the relationship between covid-19 vaccination and all cause mortality now you know I like all cause mortality why all cause well listen first the sum total of all the efforts of our Public Health authorities whether those happen to be at the level of an island nation like New Zealand which

is where this report comes from or whether it's at this country level like the United States or its continent level like Australia or however you want to look at it uh it the really what the public health authorities ought to be doing is solving for the best overall outcome and what's the best overall outcome well if you said look we saved 10 people didn't die from covid but we lost 400 more saving those 100 to I don't know fentanyl overdoses you failed right so it's it's not that hard of an argument and it should be very simple and a simple thing to ask

which is how we doing at the all-cause level and this is a really exceptional piece of work here because New Zealand gives us an extraordinary test case I'll let Mr hatchard put it out in his own words he writes here and let me get my drawing tool out so we can go over this together he writes here this release presents the association between weekly vaccination totals and all-cause mortality in the 60 plus age cohort so everybody over the age of 60 they just looked at on a weekly basis what happened when they were vaccinated and what happened to the

all-cause mortality counts he writes continuing quote this has only been possible because of our unique situation in New Zealand protected at our borders we have a very low incidence of covid and therefore the short-term impact of vaccination on health can be reviewed in isolation from the confounding factors of code infections and deaths so this is awesome because listen you know did the whole idea of who died from what you want you have to remove variables the more variables you can remove the more certain you can become and so New Zealand

presents a really unique case because they were vaccinating heavily in entire population but because of their really very strong border protections they didn't have covid inside the country so this is a really clean test and so let's check it out and see what was found because it's a really good it's a it's a real world experiment now unfortunately it comes up with some fairly troubling data he writes quote this has been a painful release to write because it involves personal tragedies affecting families and loved ones some of whom are not

actually aware of the causes of their loss or in other cases have been misled through preventable mistakes of government and civil servants for some time it has been clear that the rate of Adverse Events proximate proximate meaning near or close to to mRNA coveted vaccination is unprecedented throughout New Zealand vaccination history adverse effects reported to Carm are running at 30 times that of flu vaccines it's also apparent that many of the Adverse Events are very serious indeed Med safe which is the New Zealand equivalent of FDA

has continued to maintain that they are unable to determine which effects and deaths are related to vaccination so it sounds like New Zealand has a very similar case to what we're seeing in Australia Canada UK United States a lot of Europe uh their health authority particularly the one in charge of regulating the vaccine is not terribly interested in gathering the data and then you say hey look I think we see a relationship here and they go oh no you can't see any relationship like that you'd have to look into it and then you might say well are you

looking into it and they say oh no we haven't looked into it because there's no no evidence that there's any relationship Circle catch 22. that's how they roll this is med safe right here Med safe you can find it at medsafe.govt.nz it's New Zealand medicine and medical devices Safety Authority they do things like medicines devices compliance things like that all right carrying on uh in this report he writes here quote I have previously written about indications pointing to a causal relationship between a wide range of adverse effects and

vaccination effects range from those already admitted such as myocarditis to others recognized in a leaked Pfizer document dated April 30th 2021 including respiratory illness internal bleeding kidney and liver disease neurological disease thrombotic events including stroke immune suppression and many more this is not an exhaustive list now end quote something that's really odd to me is to see kidney and liver disease showing up for a respiratory virus this is a very odd thing or a as a consequence of a vaccine meant to address a respiratory

virus seeing kidney and liver disease really weird neurological disease really weird internal bleeding and thrombotic events kind of weird immune suppression that's kind of one of the things you have to look out for in vaccine development so this is a very odd list right here but he just raises it is uh as a way to begin this and by the way here's the approach he took which I I just thought was great speaking as a scientist he writes here the First evidential Alert to causality is always temporal Association okay that's very carefully worded let

me unpack that for all of us speaking of scientists the First evidential Alert so the first thing you're like oh I think I've got some some evidence here to causality that is oh this thing that just happened it might have been caused by this other thing right somebody pulled the trigger there was a loud noise now there's blood on that person's chest because of the temporal Association of those events you might say there's possibly a causal connection between that blood and that loud noise that just happened over there whereas if somebody pulled

the trigger and five hours later blood suddenly appeared in that person's chest you might say the the timing's wrong here it I'm you know much harder to make the causal link there and it may not exist so the First evidential Alert causality is always temporal Association that's a good way that's a good place to start he writes continuing quote of necessity association should prompt further investigation so if you have that temporal Association that's where you want to begin that that's the first place you go oh there might be something to this

right oh I just filled my car up with what I thought was gasoline and a half mile later the car engine is sputtering and has now stopped you might go back and check what you just did there did oops did you use the diesel pump in a gasoline car hey it can happen right so again that first place you want to start your investigation is whenever you find a temporal Association now what's interesting is he he went through all the proper channels in this uh wrote To The Head of this med safe thing right here which is a Dr Ashley Bloomfield who editorially if the

office is ever looking to recast characters I think I think he'd be a shoe-in for the Toby character just I'm just going by looks Dr Ashley Bloomfield here's what does he have to say um this uh the hatchet report writes says on 28th October I wrote to Dr Ashley Bloomfield pointing to the usually high level of adverse effects and requesting that reporting of adverse effects should be mandatory rather than voluntary well of course they should be when you have a brand new drug that your own country didn't even make that's shipped in in a lot of secrecy

where you can't even see the base data that's going behind it and you know it's experimental everybody knows it was experimental well what do you do with an experimental compound very simply you want to track all the data really really carefully because there's going to be things you're going to learn maybe positive things maybe negative things it's an experiment but things are only experiments if you remember to collect the data otherwise they're not actually experiments so at any rate it should have been mandatory the collecting of these

adverse effects absolutely in fact maybe should have been mandatory to collect all sorts of effects right we would want lots and lots of data Maybe these shots cure cancer how would you know well you'd have to collect a lot of data to find out so this is something that should probably always happen with any experimental medicine and even one that goes through the quote unquote full approval process even when it's on the market you want to do a lot of Sentinel recording and Reporting you just want to see what's going on out there all right yesterday

he writes here continuing on quote yesterday December 17th I received a tardy reply from Astrid cornif director of the national immunization program writing on behalf of Dr Ashley Bloomfield so didn't hear directly from Ashley himself but from somebody writing on his behalf Astrid cornif writing here quote in this Astrid specifically rejects my request saying quote an accurate measurement of all Adverse Events is not required Q scratchy record sound like that let's go whoa say what an accurate measurement of all Adverse Events is not

required okay I gotta let's parse that what do you mean by accurate measurement and we only need a sample how big should that sample be and how would we know we're getting a statistically valid sample or we're even getting an unbiased sample I could understand why you don't need actually to accurately measure all Adverse Events to find out if you have a safety signal but this is very dismissive just saying oh I don't know we don't have to measure this stuff not required uh and further suggested I can find myself to trusting Ministry of Health websites

rather than public domain sources her letter offered this view of the determination of causal relationships quote we are aware of reports circulating in social media where an adverse event has a temporal association with a vaccination this is not indicative of a causal relationship to the vaccine causal relationships between Adverse Events and the vaccine are established through robust pharmacovigilance examinations that take into consideration Global reporting of the adverse event the background rate for the condition and safety

signal analysis okay true but only if you actually do that but there's a second exception here which is actually this is false it's not true that you can only establish a relationship between an adverse event by doing robust pharmacovigilance examinations Global reporting Adverse Events and background races it's actually not true in fact having that first temporal relationship can be sufficient to give you an actual causation and here's why when this gentleman in the hatchard report took two things on this left axis right here is total

vaccine doses you can see it's going from thirty five thousand to seventy thousand a hundred and five thousand three hundred forty and on this axis is total deaths of all causes from those in the 60 plus crowd so in red is vaccine doses here and then these are all cause deaths marching up here pretty easy to see what he is describing here as quote the temporal association between all cause deaths and vaccinations for the 60 plus age cohort during the rollout of the MRNA vaccine in New Zealand between the beginning of March 2021 to the end of October

2021 is graphically rather obvious even to a lay person yeah pretty think so hmm wonder what it could be uh by the way again there's no covid confounding this particular chart so we'd have to come up with some other explanation besides the one that's just staring us right in the face here for why there was a big old lump of 60 plus total adverse event sorry total excess deaths um all-cause deaths there that coincided pretty tightly with the vaccinations he writes in continuing here quote as weekly vaccination numbers rise to a peak death's Peak

as vaccine vaccination numbers Begin to Fall deaths also fall the number of excess deaths in the weeks following vaccination is consistent with reports of 670 suspicious deaths proximate to vaccination submitted voluntarily to the New Zealand Health forum and it could actually be larger end quote why larger because Under reporting is not just possible it's actually encouraged in these systems it's encouraged in the United States to under report these things I know families that have tried like crazy to have their own family members

death be put into the U.S system which is the Vare system no luck doctor no enter it won't do it because the doctor doesn't want to get in trouble because if the doctor enters it somebody's going to come knocking on their door and say why'd you enter this there's a really strong push to not put these things in the U.S system I've heard maybe it's not as strong maybe stronger I don't know how strong it is but I've heard the same sort of resistance to getting full reporting exists in the New Zealand system so I'm comfortable saying whatever you see in the

New Zealand system is an under report of what probably actually happened that's a pretty typical thing for the yellow card system in the UK the Vare system in the US medsafe down here in New Zealand Etc so I don't know that looks pretty clear to me and it's cool if you can use that term it's cool in in New Zealand because there's no covet confounding this there's no way of saying oh you don't know Chris that rise in death could be due to covet I can say actually I do know it's not due to that um it's due to something else and it correlates really really strongly

in a temporal fashion with the administration of vaccines so that's pretty strong and in normal days this would be solid temporal scientific evidence that you would be able to use is a strong starting point for the rest of the things that I agree with once you have this then go in there and establish robust pharmacovigilance examinations look at Global reporting look at the background rates for the conditions start digging in there maybe do some autopsies take blood work you know get some data none of that's really happening because again

for whatever reason the health authorities are not interested in finding out the truth and speaking of truth I got to talk to you about uh trickle truthing we're undergoing quite a bit of it right now in relationships um trickle truth is a term refers to this quote facts that are gradually and reluctantly admitted by one significant other under questioning especially about having been unfaithful uh they might say oh yeah no I just saw them for coffee and then later they'll say oh coffee plus we held hands and then much later after suspicions

rise oh yeah there was a peck on the cheek um oh yeah no it was actually on the lips and on and on in so over time the trickle truth is designed to sort of blunt the impact of the truth which is maybe they just went home and slept with that person right all right so here's a hard trickle truth moment of the day uh this is from Reuters and you know Reuters Reuters is um is heavily conflicted because their CEO serves on the board of Pfizer and the Reuters fact Checkers as Dave column says if you believe the Reuters fact Checkers you are a special kind of stupid

quote that's from Dave column why because Reuters fact Checkers are opinion Checkers loose fact Checkers we don't know who they are they get it wrong all the time they've been horrible at it and very very one-sided it's not like coin flip they got it wrong 50 of the time they're just bad fact Checkers in fact they are biased fact Checkers so they're not actually fact Checkers when you have a bias like that at any rate what are they trickle truth in us today they say here Israeli study shows fourth shot of covid-19 vaccine less effective on Omicron

this coming to us from January 17th not that surprising to anybody watching this I'm sure so let's look at the article in yellow up top quote it says a fourth shot of kova 19 vaccine boosts antibodies to even higher levels than the third jab but it's not enough to prevent Omicron infections according to a preliminary study in Israel okay um so it yeah the third jab provided antibodies the fourth provides even higher levels but even not that many more uh just a just where you see we're asymptoting we're we're getting less bang for our buck uh we're

getting you know more and more and more Jabs in there and less and less and less of a response which surprise uh people at gear vandenbosch told us that was how this would work a year ago or more so this isn't actually surprising data it's only surprising that we had to run a study to discover it at any rate continuing the quote here they say Israel's Sheba Medical Center has given second booster shots so they've had the two priming shots or what used to be called fully vaccinated Plus a booster which would be the third plus a second booster which is

the fourth so when they say second booster shot they're talking about the fourth jab they've given the second booster shots in a trial among its Savvy and is studying the effect of the Pfizer booster in 154 people after two weeks in the moderna booster in 120 people after one week not sure why they're looking at moderna after only one week and Pfizer after two a little unclear but possibly because moderna has a much much much stronger vaccine or product whatever we want to call this thing because it has 100 micrograms of RNA in there as compared

to 30 for the Pfizer all right in green continuing quote these were compared to a control group air quotes control group that did not receive the fourth shot so that means they did your control group was people who received the third shot okay all right so they're comparing third groups to Fourth shot groups that's their control group you know it would have been in a super awesome control group totally unvaccinated people and people who'd had two Jabs um then we would have had some real controls at any rate their control group because uh people

who'd been triple jabbed all right at any rate uh those in the modern group had previously received three shots of Pfizer's vaccine so it looks like Israel is now experimenting with moderna so they threw that into the mix because Israel was almost exclusively or even was completely exclusively a Pfizer jab country so now they're trying out moderna and they're taking moderna and they're slapping it on top of the Pfizer vaccine by the way I am not aware of a single controlled study where they experiment the mixing and matching of these particular

vaccines but it's being tried all over the place desperate much it's not good science not good medicine but the experiment is being run let's hope they remember at least to collect the data because then it'll be an actual experiment all right uh the vaccines they say here in white uh led to an increase in the number of antibodies even a little bit higher than what we had after the third dose said regev okay quote in yellow yet this is probably not enough for the Omicron she told reporters we know by now that the level of antibodies needed to protect

and not get infected from Omicron is probably too high for the vaccine even if it's a good vaccine all right end quote even if it's a good vaccine hey a little tip here regive um good vaccines work so just just to find just I don't want to find a point on that but that's actually how it how it is a good vaccine would actually work what we can say is these vaccines don't work against omogram but good thank you for trying they're trying they're trying they're trying more uh what are they doing they're going to give a third jab a fourth jab sooner or later they're

going to go you know these things don't really work against Omicron which was obvious to everybody months ago but yet they try um so the data is coming out and we're getting that trickle truth which is uh that these things just don't these vaccines do not work against Omicron by the way Omicron works against Omicron really well and Omicron works against all the prior versions so far as we know so far so it provides pretty good immunity how durable that is we don't know Omicron has not been around long enough for us to really know that but at any rate

let me amend that trickle truth headline for everyone it now reads Israeli study shows fourth shot of Cova vaccine less effective than Omicron because I think that's what that's what I see in that data so just have a little fun with that headline but yeah we got to put that little change in right there um what else can I tell you oh well Time Time Magazine came out with expert opinions I had to put expert in quotes you'll see why in a second uh the headline is no you should not try to get Omicron that's the headline reading from the article in yellow quote

but actively trying to get infective isn't wise for anyone experts say okay who are these experts I love experts quote it's an unnecessary gamble for fully vaccinated people and for those who aren't vaccinated it's like playing Russian roulette with an automatic handgun this is Dr leilu fayanju Regional medical director for Oaks trade Health in Ohio all right okay Regional medical director that's our expert Russian roulette with an automatic handgun that means obviously with an automatic handgun there's always a bulletin chamber so

if you do that you're just going to shoot yourself and you're going to die so Dr leolu fayanju Regional medical director for Oak Street in Ohio his expert opinion is um you're going to die for sure if you get infected with the Omicron if you're unvaccinated hold that thought for a minute we'll show you some data next continuing on quote but even if Omicron is on the whole milder than other variants it will still be catastrophic for some people on January 3rd alone more than 1400 people in the US died from covid-19 and more than a hundred thousand were

hospitalized with the virus oh my goodness we're still here can you see how we're still hearing the story let's pick that apart two things 1400 people died from covid they said well now was that from or with and was that with this variant or were they still on ventilators for three months from a prior variant did any of these people receive early treatments that we know they should have but probably didn't did they go to the hospital and get slammed on Rendezvous in a ventilator right away because that's state-of-the-art care you know it may be

a Regional Health Center in Ohio in other words were they helped along towards the Pearly Gates by really bad substandard medical practices we need to know that before we could say how true that 1400 people statistic is and then the next one a hundred thousand people were hospitalized with the virus even the CDC and fauci have started to parse that out and said with with is not helpful are they there because of the virus or with the virus so here we see Time Magazine trotting it out saying no you should not try to get Omicron that's the expert opinion

interesting expert they had to find there to support that meanwhile non-expert opinions are very much that Omicron variant encourages some which include by which they mean almost everybody to drop covid-19 precautions despite the risks hyperinfectiousness and low disease severity convinced some of diminished danger Health experts say risks remain here's that expert thing again let's look at this article pretty cool January 17th Wall Street Journal by Renee and sumathi here in yellow up top quote omicron's ubiquity and reduced severity

are encouraging some people to drop pandemic precautions decisions that public health experts say present new risks for people at risk of severe covid-19 outcomes well okay they're parsing it a little bit here so Public Health experts say present new risks for people at risk of severe covid-19 outcomes okay at least we're at that part at least the Wall Street journals made that nod in the opening paragraph thank you wsj for doing that because some people are at risk for severe covid-19 outcomes so maybe those people should be more careful

they should take extra precautions they ought to be protected maybe they should be triple jabbed or quadruple jabbed or maybe they ought to have access to the earliest of the early treatments absolutely so there's a lot of things we could do there but let's see what happens when they continue on in green quote people including those who got vaccinated and boosted and curtailed their activities for months are letting their guard down in the face of a variant that appears to be infecting everyone but causing largely mild illness hmm how about

that largely mild illness that might get people to drop their guard because guess what we don't care about mild illnesses in purple at the bottom quote This Is A Dangerous way of thinking doctors and scientists say dangerous Omicron still poses risks to more vulnerable people including the elderly immunocompromised and those with underlying health conditions oh okay so it's true but not everybody's elderly vulnerable or immunocompromised and the people who are those things they probably know that I think the experts don't think people

know that they're just wandering around old immunocompromised and vulnerable and they don't know that somehow that's escaped their attention I just like didn't didn't look in the mirror this year you know it just did weren't tracking that um so again uh I gotta make light of this because it's just silly at this point in time it's absolutely the case that uh Omicron is vastly vastly less dangerous even the CDC had to recognize that here here's the CDC here's where Michelle wolensky who I have just absolutely no respect for at this point and I've

lost all respect for this EDC and by the way is there any CDC whistleblowers listen to this just ping me um you can get me at C Martinson you know over there um and uh on Twitter or just reach out or find me somehow just let me know you want to slip me something I'll get you a a secure email you can send me things to be awesome but at any rate that's assuming there's anybody left with integrity at the CDC heart hard to imagine there is but she writes even here according to a new study that had come out at Kaiser Permanente in Southern California 53 percent less

risk of symptomatic hospitalization with Omicron 4 74 less risk of ICU admission 91 percent less risk of death zero Omicron patients required mechanical ventilation this is a vastly different beast and by the way uh those are of people who actually are presenting to the medical system with a proper case Omicron sweeps through so wildly that on an infection morbidity or fatality rate we would find excuse me we would find that these numbers are even more dramatically reduced compared to Delta um because so many dramatically more people have

been infected because of how fast Omicron sweeps through all right a lot of awkward questions are showing up here then this is my last slide closing up with this so in slate the writing so your triple vax has still got covered now what and this person did who wrote this article they just like ah this is awkward I don't know you know of course little buyer's remote or jabbers were more uh regret they're just thinking ah this didn't work out quite the way I was hoping and feeling a little lied to Rod Drayer who I um who I just interviewed great interview

you might want to check out the rod Dreyer uh uh interview that I just did fantastic what I got I really like this guy writing in his tweet here he said day six of covid wow my wife and kids have it too all of us faxed wife and I both boosted not long ago everybody we know who has Omicron was vaxxed most also booze did repeat that everybody we know who has Omicron was vaxxed most also boosted so I gotta ask what's the point of the vaccine passports now security theater prepping social credit system by the way this really blew up look at that 111 000 likes 28

000 retweets 6.8 000 comments unbelievable um so Rod really struck lightning with that one but you gotta ask I mean this is it that's the awkward questions you got to ask that like what is the point now of the vaccine mandates obviously it's the case that the narrative around the vaccines is totally shredded they can't even give it up though they're like whoa I don't know maybe we should um let's see the this one yeah I don't know let's just give people it I know the first two Jabs didn't work the third didn't work let's try four it's like dude they're

not working Omicron shredded your jab uh hypothesis so they don't work um against Omicron and by the way Omicron ain't all that deadly and so you gotta ask the awkward questions which is like well now that we know that narrative is totally busted now what's the point is it security theater is it prepping us for some social credit system is it what's the agenda so here's the deal The Narrative is broken the agenda is rolling along Austria get a force vaccinate everybody Australia totally insane you know they have hit the Australian Open they kicked

out um Novak Djokovic and can't come in here and they had a ball boy just Keel over on the court the other day in 70 degree temperatures I don't think it was heat stroke right so the narrative is broken but the agenda rolls on and so it's time for us to rise up and to absolutely break this narrative thanks so much for listening to this remember we have this incredible um let me see if I can find this here yeah we have this incredible vent coming up this is our annual seminar it's going to be really important this year we are talking specifically about the

agenda what the agenda is Brett Weinstein is going to tell us all about it how you can evade the agenda Ben Swan's got an incredible thing Royce White incredible uh framing for this we're also George Gammon we're going to be talking about the economic side of this I don't know if you've been seeing but the markets are looking like they're ready to Creak and fall over oil is shooting up stocks are falling interest rates are spiking what does all of that mean anyway the point of this whole annual seminar is to get you ready to thrive in the next year so

this is really getting you ready this is the year in preview we had Dave column's year in review now we're doing our year in preview so you have the data and information and context you need to make a plan also you get to meet people so this is an extraordinary virtual event where we've opened up a bunch of rooms where you get to meet each other come to Peak 2022.events and you can find out more about that and get a ticket and would love to see you there so we've got a bunch of people showing up it's so far fantastically attended so we're happy as can be with

this seminar event it's going to be great hope to see you there hey thanks so much for listening today uh you get my smiling mug again back next time alright everybody thanks for listening see you next time