SCOTUS Brunson brothers 2020 election lawsuit

Watch the archived recording

Automatically generated transcript of the archived recording.

0:00 Williams had hanged himself after he was found hanging from a doorknob with a necktie. The final autopsy report released in November 2014 ruled that Williams had committed suicide in this manner. Neither alcohol nor illegal drugs were involved while all prescription drugs present in his body were therapeutic levels, the coroner declared. According to officials, Williams was found in a seated position. He was only slightly suspended with his right shoulder against the closet door. His body was stiff from rigor mortis, giving him the appearance of being sat in a chair that wasn't there.

0:31 Williams rubbed elbows with everyone in the Hollywood scene at one time or another and was exposed to everything Hollywood had to offer. The question is, how deep was he into the scene? DC Madam Deborah Jean Palfrey had the dirt on important DC mucky mucks on the air. She explicitly stated she was not suicidal. Then she was found hanging in the mother's garage again in Florida. Alex Jones was deep into this story. On November 22, 1997, an excess frontman, Michael Hutchins's body, was found hanging from a doorknob in room 524 at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Double Bay, Sydney, Australia.

1:06 The occupant in the neighboring room heard an unidentified loud male voice swearing at about 5 a.m. The coroner was satisfied that that was Hutchins arguing with another male. February 6, 1998, after an autopsy inquest, he ruled that his death was a suicide. Again, according to reports, Hudson's had information regarding a VIP pedophile ring in the UK that was connected to child-killing rapist Jimmy Saville and high-ranking politicians. And Jimmy Saville was who? Jimmy Saville was the pedophile for the Queen, and he had a very prolific.

1:43 There's streets in London named after Jimmy Saville. Saville Row, where all the men go to get their suits. I mean, this is where all the secret clubs are. I mean, if you just search Seville Row, you'll see everything that's there and named after this petto. Even Princess Diana called him out. So then we go to Alexander McQueen, which is an interesting individual. He said to have hung himself with a scarf in his closet doorknob on February 11th. So we got the 11, right? 2010.

2:13 McQueen was found in the morning by his housekeeper at his home in Green Street, London. Paramedics pronounced him dead at the scene. metropolitan police stated that the note mcqueen left was not suspicious however they did not confirm his death was a suicide photos of mcqueen's fashion shows it was obvious that he was in the thick of it and made a regular habit of signaling his alliance allegiance fashion designer kate spade committed suicide by hanging herself with a red scarf her death was eerily similar to the death of fashion designer loren scott on march 17 2014 loren scott a longtime lover of mcjagger

2:45 and former girlfriend of Nate Rothschild, was found dead by her assistant in her apartment at the Chelsea, a neighborhood of Manhattan, on March 17, 2014. March 16, by the way, is Joseph Mengele's birthday. The police reported that no note was found and there was no sign of foul play. The New York City Chief Medical Examiner determined Scott's manner and cause of death to be suicide by hanging… by a bizarre coinkydink and eerie photo of dresses hanging from a tree was posted on Loren Scott's Facebook hours after her death.

3:18 Hanging from a tree. How did that happen? Hours after her death, huh? Actor Mark Saling pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. He was said to be sentenced and was facing four to seven years behind bars. He reached a plea agreement with prosecutors in which he admitted he possessed images of prepubescent children. The agreement stated that a search warrant found more than 50,000 images of child porn on Saling's computer and a thumb drive. The question here is from whom or from where does someone procure that much illegal pornography?

3:49 The dark web? Even if he has a sick proclivity, how could 50,000 images be used just for personal use and not for distribution? Los Angeles coroner has confirmed that his cause of death was asphyxia by hanging in the manor was suicide. Right. Mark Spigot, presenter of children's TV show, S Smart, was found dead in 2008 at the age of 42, hanging in a Paddington train station. And wasn't the queen talking to a Paddington bear?

4:20 Oh, it's always about Paddington bear. Okay. So Paddington bear, for those of you who don't know, is the little cartoon character, but he's like, my husband loves Paddington bear. Okay. Cause Paddington Bear is supposed to be sweet, innocent. Every British child loves Paddington Bear. There are cartoons around Paddington Bear. He loves his little jams and Paddington Bear is always like, you know, supposed to be like the little sweet. But they pretty much use Paddington Bear to kind of rein the children in. And, you know, and think about what they're doing with Valencia.

4:55 Aga, you know, it's bears. We're always, you know, they're always, these people are always doing the same thing. They're sick. And also I wanted to say too, that when you're talking about Alexander McQueen, one of his main things in design is skulls. If you just look up Alexander McQueen and you'll see that the majority of designs were skulls. You know, I don't know if he was trying to send a message through his designs or if that was something that they wanted him to do, but one of his most interesting purses, I'll bring it up really quick, Penny, just so we can

5:30 show the audience. But one of the most interesting purses here and things, and I'm just going to do, I just did a quick Google search for Alexander McQueen skull. So you guys can see what that is. But these are just some of the pieces that he created. Yeah. So you've got the skull, You've got mushrooms. Listen, and I'm all about, let me just say this. I believe in the human body. So when it comes to skulls, I have a different view than a lot of people do. I don't always see them as death. I think it's God's creation. That's just my point of view. A lot of people will disagree.

6:14 but you know when we are looking at different things we have to you know we do have to remember these are God's creations and and they've really taken it I mean this is an this is an x-ray that he utilized okay so this is one of his scarves so that's one of his scarves then let's go back and find this is one of the most famous purses that he designed. This is the one of the most famous styles and you can see there's always

6:48 typically a skull on McQueen's items that are very hidden. See the skull here at the top of the right finger? So those are things that they kind of interject. So a lot of our skull items actually come off of the Alexander McQueen brand because they're just kind of skulls. Some of them are out in the open and then while others are very obscure in the designs. So, yeah.

7:23 So then I wanted to, I bring up Alexander McQueen because he's exceedingly interesting. So he founded his own Alexander McQueen label in 1992. He's a chief designer at Givenchy from 1996 to 2001. His achievements at what? Givenchy. Sorry. Givenchy, not Givenchy? No, Givenchy. Oh, huh. I've always said Givenchy. Oh, Givenchy. I've always said it that way.

7:54 Good to know. His achievements earned him four British Designer of the Year awards, 1996, 97, 2001, and 2003, as well as the CFDA's International Designer of the Year Award. He died from suicide in his home in 2010 at the age of 40 in Mayfair, London, shortly after the death of his mother. Now, the reason why I bring Alexander into purview… Well, and here's one of the things he did. He's the British designer.

8:25 He designs a lot of the Queen's and Kate's clothing, her he did but he also uses this british you know the the union jack flag you can kind of see the design is is based off of the union jack flag and he also formed a partnership with gucci yes he did and as and as we know gucci's also in the forefront of lawsuits in which was a daughter or granddaughter that said that she's abused sexually abused um there's lots okay and gucci

8:56 We also had several creative directors over the years. The creative director right now is Alessandro Michelle, Michelle. And they have Gucci garden in Florence, Italy. And I do have some behind the scenes that I'll be posting on my PS, this rocks fashion and design blog of Gucci garden. So make sure if you haven't subscribed and I'll also share that on christytasker.com because there's some beautiful, beautiful designs, but Gucci, Gucci, a lot of

9:30 people don't realize these brands, they have creative directors and it's the creative director that really is supposed to direct what's happening with the brands. So they, they really have changed over the years. So like for instance, um, one of the creative directors for Gucci, it's, he's actually leaving my mind right now. He's an American designer, but very plain. You wouldn't even think of their designs as being the same. I'll pull up, I'll pull those up, Penny, while you're. So I'm wondering how many of them are also linked to Balenciaga, okay, because all these

10:00 people, they work together. So you have people from Gucci working for Balenciaga. You have people from, you know, from all over in the fashion industry that they all know one another, and they know the dirty secrets that are going on. Yes, they do. So McQueen was HIV positive. He was an avid scuba diver, and uses passion as a source of inspiration designs. And you received press attention after the May, 2007 suicide of the magazine editor, Isabella blow rumors were published that there was a rip between McQueen

10:33 and blow at the time of her death, focusing on McQueen's under appreciation, but McQueen denied these rumors. Okay. Now, Dave, Dave LaChapelle, not the David Chappelle that we know was a friend of designer. and he said that McQueen was doing a lot of drugs and was very unhappy at the time of his death. Stephen Pereira, McQueen's psychiatrist, said he had mixed anxiety and depressive disorder for at least three years and had taken drug overdoses as cries for help. He had taken drug overdoses in May and July of 2009.

11:04 He also said McQueen had repeatedly missed psychiatric sessions, adding that there had been enormous difficulty in getting him to personally and physically come to appointments. While McQueen's death came by coincidence, there's no coincidence, just days before London Fashion Week. He was not scheduled to appear there. So these are some of the people that showed up at his funeral. Kate Moss, Sarah Jessica Partner, Naomi Campbell, Sella McCartney, Daphne Guinness, Sam Taylor Johnson, Erin Taylor Johnson, Lady Gaga, Anna Wintour,

11:37 and how do you say the first guy's name, Bajor? I don't see it. It's B-A-J-O-R-K. he performed a version of gloomy sunday while dressing up a queen gown yeah and the queen also had um you know during that london fashion week i'm going to try to bring this up um penny is because um because this is really important um to show um during this london fashion week he also had a be you know like they displayed in their ads you know

12:11 a beheaded dress. I mean, so, you know, when these people are, they're doing things, um, they are, you know, really showing what they're doing. Um, so they're really, really showing what they're doing. Hold on. Can you see that photo really good? For some reason, it's not wanting to populate. Keeps wanting to populate as blank. Um, so we're going to have to look at it small here, just in the search. But notice this has no head on it. Okay. So see the one to the right basically

12:43 has no head. So hold on. The most iconic dresses is finally going to come up. Yeah. I mean, it's, it's, it's, it's really sick what they do because, you know, with them having like no head, you know, it's just one of these things where it's like, how gross can we get, you know? and notice how even they dress themselves okay so he had we love you Kate okay so um so he is referring to there as not Kate that we're talking about not Kate Spade

13:22 but Kate British Kate okay and at the same time he's basically showing you know this dress with birds and no head on the girl. Okay. So this, you know, they basically took and chopped, you know, this off, but yeah, Gaga wears his things. Um, uh, I won't call her princess Kate. What is she? I don't even like, I don't keep up with the British monarchy. Um, but it's Kate, you know, Kate, um, William and Kate, that's the Kate.

13:57 Oh, right. Okay. I'm not sure. I think she's a princess, but I'm not sure. I don't think she's princess. I don't think she's Diana status, but these are his designs. I mean, he's, he's, you know, very, I mean, these are birds, by the way, bird feathers. Sorry. These are bird feathers on this dress, just in case anybody's wondering, but I mean, he, he's very artistic and metal. He uses a lot of metal, a lot of beading on everything. A lot of flowers. This is actually very Dior, believe it or not, off of their spring collection from like the 1950s.

14:32 But he also did the dress for Kate to get married in. So I'm pretty sure he did this dress. Yeah. Yeah. The number one dress. Yeah. Kate Middleton's dress with the applique lace and flowers was handcrafted by the lace making technique at the house of McQueen. So there you go. And now, so the reason why I brought McQueen up, there's a reason why.

15:04 You want to bring me back in? Yeah. The reason why is because a conceptual art piece made by Tina Gorjnok highlighted the possibility for corporations to copyright another human's DNA. She created a series out of pig leather, tanned and tattooed to be similar to McQueen's skin. She filed patents for her method of replicating McQueen's skin in the lab and displayed these patents along with the leather collection. McQueen's family said they didn't condone the use of his DNA for fashion projects, but acknowledged that this project is exactly the sort of fashion experimentation that he would have enjoyed.

15:41 so for the for as far as my knowledge is concerned because i researched this he he wanted this project to happen in which they were taking his skin replicating it and making skin purses and leather and skin jackets from his dna yeah so this is it so mcqueen's dna turned into human leather goods by tina gornick thank you this is on a disease which is a very popular interior design and architectural magazines. So, you know, evidently they thought it was really

16:18 cool. So these are some of the products that she made utilizing his DNA. So for those of you who don't believe in clonade and John Walsh going to clonade in the Bahamas, you should look that one up too. You know, because all these people, they're doing everything together. I mean, this is, you know, it's like every time, Penny, every time I go to research something, I feel like I have to go down the rabbit hole of something else because they are all interconnected in some way, shape or form. Yes, they are. I mean, I don't think any of this,

16:55 I would not want to wear somebody's, you know, personally wear somebody's DNA or especially Alexander McQueen's, but, but that's, that's what they want to do with children. They basically want the children's DNA. They need to, they need, they need us to approve of that. So whenever, you know, you're approving of abortions and things like that, you know, that's basically what's happening. So do we have, is our next guest slated to come in? Does he have a link? He is slated to come in, Penny. Yes, he is. Let me just show you back. So I'll keep going. Now I'm going to go back

17:29 again to a Balenciaga and we're going to go back to um to Kanye second let's see yeah because we need to see if all of this is really a distraction um for Balenciaga okay I'm going to play this right here so this is a person who said I went to the Balenciaga show this is three minutes so I'm going to fast forward it to a point where when he's just like getting up getting dressed doing a run doing his thing and now he's going to the show so this is what will happen in at art basil penny so

18:06 this is what they do they have you know at during fashion week and like during art basil a lot of fashion companies will actually um have events and i have actually done a lot of their not not balenciaga i've never done balenciaga okay um but i have done some of the events for fashion companies. Um, and the events and this, so, you know, basically what we do is we get influencers in to preview the lines and, um, they come in from, you know, everywhere. And, um, so this is

18:39 probably an influencer. I can't see exactly who it is. Um, but no idea. I don't know if this is just a person that just posted this and said, you know, he went to the show. I don't know if he's an influencer, just a normal person, but he shows us a little back glimpse of him arriving. It's not particularly poignant, but I just want you to see the show. Now, this looks like a soundstage, so they're outside. So, is this where the mud

19:09 fashion show was? Right? It's not outside. They actually fashioned this in a warehouse somewhere. Yeah, that's correct. Yeah. Basically, we basically go in and like it'll be like whenever we start an event like this, it'll be a complete like warehouse or a museum. Sometimes it really depends on what it is, what the setting is or what the location is. But you'll set the stage and set the scene or sometimes it has been actually outside.

19:43 I mean, so these are major productions. They're set like productions in order to preview a fashion line. And the really interesting thing that people may be very interested in that I've even never really understood myself is why we show items that we will never actually have like on a rack for people to buy. You know, I just got a notification from actually, I'm not going to tell you who it is, but the individual told me it.

20:13 Kate is Princess of Wales. Yeah, Princess of Wales. Okay, yeah. I mean, yeah. Okay, so here we go. That's Anna Wintour, by the way. Is that Kanye? That's Kanye. Kanye, yeah. That was Kanye, right? Yeah, that's Kanye, But Anna Wintour is the lady with the chopped hair who is the, you know, the devil wears Prada supposedly about her.

20:49 But she's interesting. Right. And I didn't get a chance to put all those pictures in this presentation, but we will talk about it further. Yeah, everything Kanye is doing is very dark. um even even his videos when even the video that he's done i forget the name of it where supposedly he's it's like a war he's claiming that it's like a worship song i mean you guys

21:19 for what it is but i mean the one that's dark where he has everybody in hoods black hoods um you know look why is red the only color why do they need to look like Like walking through mud and horrific conditions. I mean, these are absolutely horrific conditions. And I'm sorry, but I mean, Penny, do you see anything that you would actually wear? No. And I, you know, I did. I am short, but I was still on the runway. Were you?

21:50 Yes. The runway was the only place I was. Because I'm 5'11". Everybody's always surprised when they meet me, Penny. Because I look like a giant. I did minor shows, nothing major, always underneath the radar. I forget half of what I did. My dad was actually reminding me that. Okay, there we go. Oh, yeah. Oh, wow. That person. Okay. Now, let's just play a little bit more. That's a man.

22:21 That's leather. Okay, now, I think I have another. so they're they're advertising summer 203 but this was october right they're always ahead so so fashion is always a season ahead right but it was it it was actually from the october 22 2002 collection right oh actually october 2 not 22 october 2nd 2022 yeah so october so the fall 2000

22:54 collection and they're saying that it's spring, right? Wasn't it spring? So now I'm going to just play this individual. Why does this is a man dressed in leather woman's dress. He looks like he looks like an old lady. Yeah. And the other thing, too, that you know from Runway, you're supposed to stand up nice and straight.

23:27 Yes. He's very slunched over, slouchy. It's like they've told him to walk slouchy like an old, old person. What is he representing, Christy? Witches? What is this? I have no idea, Penny. I mean, it's definitely very satanic looking. It looks like he has ropes. he has on like gloves it looks like he's wearing a purse because he's got a pull thing in front of him right a handle yeah is he being handled is that what the message is of being handled

24:01 yeah he's got a handle around his neck he absolutely has a handle around his neck yep that's a good I didn't even notice that because when I look at this I'm like it's so disgusting to me that you know of like what this is and that people are actually you know buying into it. And I'm, and I'm very, you know, I'm thinking that it's, this could be a massive distraction from what's to come with SCOTUS. Our guest is, hasn't responded as of yet. So hopefully

24:35 I told him to come on in when he's ready. And that's Lloyd Brunson, who has the, who has the case during the Supreme Court. And I want to make sure that everybody gets to hear what happened, because I found that actually very hopeful. And I'm not trying to fill people with hopium. It's completely different than any other case. And when people hear the story of how the case got started and about SCOTUS actually calling him to submit the case, this is a very interesting,

25:09 the whole dynamics are very interesting. And what makes it most interesting to me is it's a pro se case. In other words, no attorneys are behind it. Yes. And it's the first case that SCOTUS has had that is not about the election results, but is about a constitutional issue of our Congress members not following the law and the Constitution. so isn't that interesting extremely interesting so um so while we're waiting for that individual

25:43 to come we'll just keep um you know reporting a bit on balenciaga i don't know how much more you have because um i i've got a lot if if we um have time to fill because i've found so much okay once you bring forth because you were asking me to research and i was hoping that um johnny would be bringing forth some of his research. I'm not sure what happened to him. Maybe he lost his connection. But you were asking me to research the company. So why don't you go ahead and share what you discovered? Okay. Yeah. I'm going to pull up a couple of things that I think people

26:21 would be really interested in first and showing you where to find them on Twitter, because I have started just posting any research that I found on Patriot's Perspective Twitter, which is the handle is at news behind truth. So news behind truth right here, you can find it. So some of the things that have occurred that people have realized is that, that they are associated with Adidas. So Adidas, so, you know, this is, you know, people are saying, oh, this is

26:53 a Photoshop trick. I mean, who knows? It's not a Panda. Okay. So maybe it is, I don't really, I haven't really had time to research aspects, but I mean, these are just sick things that, you know, what these people are doing. This is art that they create. And I will tell you, Art Basel, I want to say it was 2021 or 2020, maybe 20, a banana, a real banana taped with duct tape to a wall went for like over a million dollars okay that's insane

27:30 yeah so can you read what it says on the side i personally started realizing that she's behind this weird bondage bdsm that starts to enter the fashion world like adidas collab yep and so they this is it's a very sick thing um these are photos um that people have basically and this is a lot of Lada Vodkova is the best man I would pronounce it. And she is evidently one of the people that is creative direction behind.

28:01 So this was, it says Johnny Dolfert and Lada Kvodot as part of my portfolio at Double Magazine. So this was evidently a Chanel, you know, this is evidently Chanel clothing, by the way. I do not think Chanel, I've been in Chanel's personal apartment in Paris. I don't think she would have gone for this. I'm just saying like, you know, I mean, obviously. You have an extensive past revolving around fashion that many people don't understand what it actually is.

28:37 Can you share a little bit of that? Yeah. So I'll actually share. It's actually a good suggestion, Penny, because it is really a God thing. OK, so I know that people, you know, if you don't have God in your life, it's very hard to imagine that these things can happen. OK, so I have very good instincts. I say that comes from my father. But I have had the privilege, Boyd, my mother-in-law used to actually live in Scotland.

29:09 So she's Scottish, lived in Scotland. And for Christmases and things like that, booking tickets through Paris were a lot cheaper than going directly through the UK. And a lot of people don't realize that the train is only about an hour from London to Paris. So a lot of times we would book work trips to Paris. And we're always like very, we like to stay at nicer places, but we don't, we're not going to pay the price. I actually say we live in luxury for less because we keep our plans fluid.

29:42 It's just the two of us on many occasions, which makes it easy. So we don't have an entire family. We're not trying to plan a trip for hundreds of people or anything like that. So Boyd actually booked us into a hotel in Paris. And I kept saying to him, oh, honey, there's something about this hotel. Like there's something around us. And I knew there was a Chanel store next door, but little did I know. So I went next door and actually went there on Christmas or Christmas Eve.

30:13 It was either Christmas or Christmas. Yeah, Christmas. It was actually on Christmas or the day after Christmas. So I go in and I talk to the salesperson and she goes, oh, I said, oh, this is such a unique store. I don't know what it is about it. She says, you're very intuitive. And I told her, listen, you know, I can't afford Chanel. I can't even fit in the clothing. Keep in mind, I am 5'11". Anything that's made, it does not come in my size. Everything has to be like arms have to be adjusted, so on and so forth.

30:47 So she says, you have come here because you, this is Chanel's apartment. Chanel's apartment is right through these doors. And I was like, you're kidding. and I didn't even ask her to go. And she says, no, I want you to come in. It's 31 Rue de Cambron. And so this is me going into her, going into her apartment. This is the little foyer area. And they were renovating upstairs. So what you're seeing here is, you know, after some of the

31:22 renovation, some, you know, everything wasn't exactly perfect. But yeah, so you can scroll through these photos on my blog called psthisrocks.com. So, you know, I just like to take photos. I like to look and see how other people have lived, but this is Chanel's apartment. She obviously loved books and, you know, fun things. But yeah, it's just really about intuition there. So then, you know, I explained to her that my husband does some work with Maison and Objet

31:56 and the trade show industry. And so I basically got invited back and I can go back anytime and watch any of the, any of the fittings, you know? And so, you know, they loved that, that number one, I told them the truth about what's here, but this is actually the stairwell that you saw me on. So this is the stairwell of how many floors there are, but these are mirrors over to the right. So that can be a little interesting to see, but yeah, this is, this is it.

32:28 So, um, yeah, if you want to follow that blog, I have a lot more that I'm going to be posting. I'm actually have Trump Turnberry, um, coming up. So that's what I wanted to ask John about was the secret service. And, you know, a lot of people, you know, may be interested in my main business and I'm not trying to give a commercial, but I'm going to give a commercial cause I never do penny. So I hope you don't mind. No, do it. Marshall's first. You know, a lot of people don't know that I actually do have my own fashion line now. It's, you know, I call it fun,

33:00 affordable fashion. There's earrings, brooches, necklaces, even men's bow ties, just things that I enjoy designing, scarves, sunglasses, and lighting lamps, custom furniture, wall coverings. So all the patterns I even design. Okay. So, and they'll say exclusive when they're my exclusive pattern designs, but, you know, I love fun things, Penny. So if you like fun things, you know, these are all, you know, they are all handmade.

33:34 I did not hand make every single one of them. So people do ask, you know, once they're made and the design is done, I have people that do help me make them. and they are in various countries. So, you know, some are in Italy, some are about conservation, you know, so I say the descriptions on my site are pretty interesting because, yeah, so these are actually some that I designed after I learned about coral here in Miami. We'll have to get into that when people say, you know, there's this, you know, going green and about our

34:10 planet itself. There's a guy named David Vaughn and he has the Moat Laboratory and he has figured out a way to grow coral 40 times faster in the wild than scientists have. But I bet nobody has heard of him. Imagine that. I hope he's still alive. But so these are basically earrings that we designed around that and the proceeds actually go to his organization. So, you know, I like to do fun things like that. But yeah, that's a little bit of my background. But a lot of people probably

34:46 don't know too, that I actually started in digital media because of my design business. So you can actually go to puttingout.com. Puttingout.com is where I've won like tech awards. You know, I have had a very interesting life. But my company offers full service management. And I used to be on Silicon Valley NBC News as a trusted source for social media tips for small businesses. Because I like to help people like myself who are, when I say like myself, small business owners

35:22 and help them grow. And I've always wondered why we couldn't, you know, you could get a business to a certain point, Penny, but they just couldn't get all the way there. And they're very deserving, better artists, better creative directors, better everything, but they could not get there. Now we know why. Yes, we do. That's what I say. So, you know, that's a little bit about, you know, about me. I am not sure where our guest is. Okay. Okay. Oh, I'm here. He says we can't

35:56 see him. Hold on a second. Oh, maybe because I need to go small screen. Here we go. So I can see here we go everybody here already knows who you are because we've been saying that Balenciaga and all this fashion is nothing more than a distraction for what's going on at SCOTUS we hope so welcome to Patriots for Stuff

36:26 I'm self-conscious about my shirt now after all that fashion stuff I'm self-conscious about my shirt Don't be. What you're doing is way more important. And we're very grateful that, you know, every time I see a case go to the Supreme Court, I'm always so excited. And, you know, as much as many times as we've been let down, your case is the first one that is not about election results. Right. Did I get that right? Yeah, absolutely. It's real important. It's not about the outcome of the election. It's really addressing the concerns of the Democrats and the Republicans about election fraud. They both both sides have claimed that, haven't they? So this is about securing an honest election for everyone. So what the defendants did was they breached our national security by not investigating the fraud claims. So anyway.

37:21 Right. Tell us what they did and what laws they broke and what part of the Constitution, because we have not. What motivated you to file the litigation? Right. Right. Well, you can go to seven discoveries dot com and you can actually download the complaints. There are two complaints that are federal complaints. I started first as the plaintiff. I have two brothers and one of them is the legal brain and the other one is great at what he does. And so it started with mine. Mine was kind of getting stuck. And then my other brother decided, hey, maybe we should have two lawsuits going and we're shooting for the Supreme Court.

37:59 We knew the U.S. attorneys were going to be able to dismiss the cases in the lower courts. And so we we were fine with just getting decisions quickly. So it's like, hey, there's a motion to dismiss. And the judge grants that motion. Great. Let's move on to the next court. so they're identical cases and my brother's uh roland got there first even though mine was filed far before his was and so his plan paid off to have uh two cases going at the same time it was kind of three cases because we actually sued the federal court for for stopping they actually

38:34 blocked me from even filing a case so we took them we took the federal court and the 10th circuit Court of Appeals to the state court, but that's a whole nother story. So this case is charging the defendants with violating their oath of office for national security breach, because here are a hundred credible witnesses, members of Congress, headed by Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley and the others, showing evidence and testifying that there are crimes that have been committed that need to be investigated. And the others just kind of shrug their shoulders like, well, it wouldn't make any

39:08 difference. It's like, it doesn't matter if it makes any difference. When there are crimes, when you go to a police department, you say, hey, there's a crime been committed, and they don't investigate it, they become an accomplice to the crime. They're protecting the potential criminal. So when you have 100 members of Congress witnessing to the rest that there needs to be a criminal, you know, an investigation for just a simple 10 days, it wouldn't have hurt them one bit. Mike Pence should have said, look, I have a constitutional obligation with the electoral votes here, but we need to investigate before we take that action.

39:40 And they didn't. So they are now defendants in a case that made it to the Supreme Court. And believe me, the U.S. attorneys tried to dismiss it. The courts actually tried to stop it. And their last ditch effort was the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. It looks like they just thought they could sit on and not make a decision. Because I think they knew that as soon as they make a decision, we go to the Supreme Court with it. And they didn't make a decision. And then we found Rule 11, which allows you to bypass the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and go straight to

40:12 the Supreme Court if you can convince the court that it's a national emergency. And so under Rule 11, the national emergency claim, we sent off our petition to the Supreme Court. Five days later, received a phone call from the clerk's office saying that they were accepting our petition as a national emergency, allowing us to bypass the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. So we're there. There's more to the story there. I don't know how much you want me to get into it, but that's basically it, where we have a case now in front of them that it was almost impossible to get to them.

40:45 And now they literally have the power to remove every single federal officer listed as a defendant in the complaint from federal office and bar them from holding public office the rest of their lives, federal, state, and local, in addition to some other reliefs. So we're pretty happy about it. Oh, Chrissy, you're muted. Oh, am I muted? No, Chrissy is. I can hear you. It's like, hey, I'll start over. I want to make sure Americans heard every word that you said,

41:17 because you guys are not attorneys. You've had to fight through attorney's courts. And how did, can you tell us a little bit how you actually got past that 11th Circuit Court? You know, because when they're sitting on a case, they sit on these cases and hopes that they're going to run out of time or, you know, everything is about timing. Sure. That's a good question. You know, you hear a lot of stories about cases and that's like, oh, we got tossed. It's like, Well, what level did you get tossed?

41:47 We knew it was good. We knew we were going to lose on the lower level. So we just wanted a decision quick and, you know, as fast as possible. So what you do is you lose in the lower courts and you appeal it. You appeal it to the appellate court. You appeal it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. So my brother's case, he started in state court. He was suing the defendants in state court. The U.S. attorneys, we moved it to the federal court of Utah and lost there, of course. That's what we expected. Go ahead and we'll lose in the motion to dismiss. And then it goes to the Tenth Circuit.

42:18 And I think the Tenth Circuit is getting a little wise to knowing that we were going to take this to the Supreme Court. Because look at the justices on the court. They could be a little scary to some liberals. And not that this is about liberal or conservative, you know. And so here we are at the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals waiting three or four months and no decision. I mean, the U.S. attorneys are waiting for a decision, too. We're waiting for a decision. So what's taking so long? So finally, we found this rule 11.

42:49 It's the Supreme Court rule 11 that tells you that if you can convince the clerk, the court, the Supreme Court, that it's a national emergency, they will accept the petition based on rule 11. So right on the cover, it'll say under this court, this court's rule 11 petition. So it's a special petition for rid of certiorari under this, you know, this court's rule 11. So we sent it off and about five days later, we got a phone call from the court, the clerk's office. Now, the clerk of the court is not a judicial clerk. Now, the clerk of the court is an attorney and for 11 years, he represented the United States Supreme Court as their counsel.

43:32 OK, so so we get a call from his office, a case analyst telling us that they had received the rule 11 petition and that they had decided to accept it without worrying about the 10th circuit. So it's like you have permission to bypass the 10th Circuit because this is a national emergency. And and then they asked us if they could if we could put some additional pleadings in it that they had been studying, you know, from the docket.

44:03 And so we did that. And about two days before we were ready to, you know, get it to them, they about two days, we we we got a notice from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals that they'd made a decision. And it's like, what's going on? Did they know about this? And so they make a decision so it wouldn't show up as a rule 11, which would make them look bad. And so anyway, they made the decision. So we call the clerk's office and we explain, hey, we just got a notice from the 10th circuit. They made a decision. So do we need to continue to do the rule 11? And they said, no, you don't need it. Just take it out. We thought we'd just leave it in. They said, no, just take it out. You don't need it.

44:42 and get it to us. And how soon can you get it to us? They said. And they, it's like, there was kind of a struggle there. It's like, well, it's going to be a couple of weeks. And they go, well, can you get it a little quicker than that to us? It's like, that would work, but we'd like to really get this as soon as possible. And so instead of two weeks, we were able to get it to them in one week. We sent it on a Thursday, which was October 20th. And they received on a Friday, the 21st and Monday, the 24th. They filed and docketed it.

45:13 They showed that it was filed the day we sent it, which is standard procedure. And so it's on the docket. And then they noticed notified the U.S. attorneys that they had about 30 days to exercise their right to oppose it. They have one chance to oppose it before it goes to conference. And so they were noticed that they only had till Wednesday, the 23rd, the day before Thanksgiving, to oppose this petition before it goes to conference where the nine justices vote and for a vote in favor of it moving forward. It moves forward. OK, so here we're wondering if they're going to do anything and comes the day before Thanksgiving, the day that it's due, we're thinking they're going to miss their deadline.

45:52 And then we get noticed from the court that the U.S. attorneys are no longer representing the defendants. And a new person has taken over representing the defendants. And it's I think her name is Elizabeth Preloader. She's the United States Solicitor General has now taken over the case. And she did us the biggest favor. It was wonderful. I just want to give her a hug. She waived their right to oppose it. she signed a waiver opposing to oppose this,

46:25 this petition before it goes to conference. And we're thinking, wow, this is a, there is a God and the God that there is, is the God of the constitution. And we know who the God of the constitution is because article seven of the constitution tells us who that is with the words in the year of our Lord, right? The Christian calendar. So we're thinking, wow, this is just one of the many miracles. So here we are now where it hasn't been opposed. and they can go to conference now. We're looking at the docket every day. You can go to 7discoveries.com,

46:57 and you can see real-time updates on everything that's happening, and you can actually order the exact petition, exact copy of what is required that the Supreme Court accepts. You have to bind it, and it's a very complex format to keep it separate. So anyway, so we're just waiting now to see the docket show that there's scheduled for conference. And if you look, if you go to SupremeCourt.gov, you'll see that there's a conference scheduled for this Friday.

47:27 I don't know if they're going to hear ours or, you know, have ours at that conference or the following Friday. But they can do anything they want with this now because of the nature of the case. They can completely adjudicate the complaint. They can do anything with this. So that's kind of where we're at now. Any questions? That is, that is, I have so many questions. Penny, do you want to go with questions first? No, you go first. So first of all, I'm super excited that they called you and that there is an opportunity

47:58 that, I mean, that's, that's, that's like unheard of. Okay. Number two. We were, we were stunned. They're characterizing the case. They're examining it and characterizing it as something of importance. Now, go ahead. Yeah. And then, you know, with that, that you guys did all of this pro se without an attorney. Right. Yeah, we had to do it that way. If we'd hired a law firm, we would have never got anywhere with it. We would have never gotten it done.

48:29 Because law firms, law firm, if we'd gone to a law firm, they would say, well, you're you we have to go to the court of claims. But before we do that, we've got to get a waiver. We've got to get permission from the sergeant. And I was going to do this and that. And we wouldn't we wouldn't even gone into the federal court. So my brother, because he had had experience representing himself before suing some banks because he was upset with the prime with the subprime mortgage bundling with the stocks and everything. He was hurt by that. And so he decided to do it himself because he didn't like the attorneys, what they were doing.

48:59 And so he just learned procedure and he's found it's kind of interesting. He's found that lawyers have their own kind of kind of culture and their own kind of ways that they that they proceed with procedure different than what they're actually supposed to follow. So we follow their rules. We believe better than the attorneys could do. And and my brother, Darren, brilliant. He got it to the Supreme Court. And again, it's not about the outcome. It's not about whether it's Republican or Democrat.

49:29 It is about it's supporting and protecting anyone that votes that wants to participate in a fair, sound, truthful, honest constitutional election. That's what it's about. So it's not about it's not about deniers. It's not about denying an election. It's about investigating crimes when crimes have been reported by 100 credible witnesses, namely members of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate. And they failed their duty. And that is an act of treason. It's a violation of the oath of office. And it is a sincere, a serious security breach because it's it's like it's like sort of like Pearl Harbor.

50:06 You know, it's like you hear these stories. You saw stories maybe about people with guys, you know, military people calling and say, hey, there's a bunch of planes coming towards Hawaii and they don't check it out. That's exactly right. And, you know, that is that was the most shocking. You know, I think that all of America was shocked, you know, when when they didn't investigate, when Pence didn't investigate, you know. And like you said, it's not about a specific politician. We just want to know who wins what. And, you know, I've used I've used a terminology, and you may agree or disagree, but one ballot one day and and people counting them.

50:45 It has to be one paper ballot one day of people counting that we did it before. We can do it again. We're not idiots. You know, we're not. And this is it doesn't matter who wins as long as the actual ballots are actually counted. But right now we have zero idea who actually won. Exactly. We know that there were mules out. We know that there's a hundred different things going on and being in technology. You know, I'm in technology. I understand technology. I understand algorithms. And I'm just telling you, every time I've gone to vote, there has been something go on that could easily have stolen my vote.

51:21 Matter of fact, to the point where I can prove that my own votes did not count in our Miami-Dade elections. And Governor DeSantis has done nothing about it. There's been no response. And people are always waiting for a politician. So you've actually encouraged me to do some sort of filing. I don't know what it is. But basically, when I have a vote that didn't count, you know, whatever it may be, I can prove that my vote did not count and that there has to be something wrong somewhere. And some people look at it, go, well, you know what?

51:52 It's OK, Christy, because the Republican won. No, it's not. It's not OK. It's not OK when your vote for your person did not count. OK, whether it be a primary election and the primary elections are some of the most important. So it's not about whether a Republican in the end won. It's about the people's vote counting. And the only way we're ever going to get a fair election is to know and hold the people accountable. So I absolutely like music to my ears for you to actually like do this.

52:26 I mean, I'm so, you know, I feel like we're all kind of down and out. Like, you know, we're hearing the BDSM, you know, Balenciaga and the ball, you know, and it's like we can only talk about that so much. And then when when I heard about you, I don't even remember how I heard about you. Um, but, you know, but I, I am part of defend Florida. We've, you know, we're all, we're all, we all just want to make sure that our votes are counting no matter which side people are on.

52:58 And, you know, this is a huge part of the huge piece of the puzzle. And I am going to be in prayer, hoping and praying that, um, that SCOTUS actually does the right thing. Um, and for their protection because, you know, these people, they're under a mass amount of protection as a whole. And they're, you know, they're going to be riots no matter which way you look at it. But the reality is, I do think a lot of people are awake right now and they're ready for it.

53:32 And I pray that they do the right thing. Oh, it could be a pretty smooth transaction, actually. Transition, I should say. Because you think about all the riots. Why did we have all those riots because the police stood down. We wouldn't have had any of that if the police had just been allowed to do their job. So I think this could be very smooth. Yes, exactly. Because I'm going to say this, this is not about even the presidential election. This is all down ballot. Okay. Because I'm telling you, there are politicians here locally in Miami that did not

54:02 win. Our mayor, a Republican mayor who is, you know, all about Bitcoin and all about his, the world's greatest mayor, if you ask Davos, who's, by the way, trying to take away the breath of every Floridian, if you ask him through his Green New Deal approaches. So he's Republican. We have to realize these things. They are on both sides of the fence. These are regimes. These are mafias running our lands. We have to call it out. We can't be afraid of them. Listen, I live across the street from his dad. So to take me out would be nothing. And they know exactly who I am,

54:36 the lady with the two dogs, you know? So guess what? But, but, but they're a little afraid because they know that I go on and I speak about it and they know that I'm a, I call out both sides. Okay. So it doesn't really matter to me. I'm basically trying to be open-minded, neutral, and American per, I'm a constitutionalist. So I've done, Christy, I'm sorry. I found an article on American Digital News about this. So I'm just going to read a little bit background.

55:08 Brunson V. Alma S. Adams et al. and Biden Harris Pence and 385 members of Congress. Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other. The first one, followed by Lloyd Brunson, is still held up in the Utah Federal Court. The second one, followed by, is it Rowland? Rowland, yes. Rowland J. Brunson has made it, is it Brunson? Yes.

56:00 Lawsuits are about the defendants breaking their oath of office. I do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The question, how can you support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answers, you investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from?

56:34 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No. It's about the members of Congress who voted against the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? Yes. the relief that Loy and Raylan are seeking the defendants be permanently removed from office and

57:04 not allowed to hold a public office again so now I have a little bit of background it says your case background Loy, Raylan and Darren and Gaynor Brunson the brothers witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged what got their attention was when the proposition to investigate their claims was presented to congress and put to a vote What came to a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress, along with VP Mike Pence, actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation.

57:39 Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation. The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Darren had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption that part of the financial world. So he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress, along with VP Pence, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

58:12 He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied. But this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation. Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio-video television business, Rock Canyon Studios. So Darren got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Lloyd to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a complaint.

58:43 Because he would be on the complaint, the court would refer to him as the plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called defendants. Loy followed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in federal court. So they got together and decided to have their brother, Raylan, file an identical lawsuit with his name on it in the Utah Second District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the federal court, Raylan's lawsuit eventually made it to SCOTUS. And then it talks about the events. That's awesome.

59:14 Pretty good story. So my question is after. OK, so we have these investigations, right? So how are we going to make sure? Because I think we have to. I'm sure that you guys have strategized further because, you know, let's say we are able to kick all these people out. These are the same people who voted for the same investigators that investigated 9-11 that are questioned by over 3,500 scientists, engineers and architects who say that that was a fraudulent investigation where they spent less than $2 million to investigate all of 9-11.

59:51 So think about that, right? 9-11 spent $2 million. They come to Florida. The same investigators come to Florida to investigate Surfside, the collapsed Surfside. Here recently, 20 years later, they needed to auto collapse that building on July the 4th. We cannot let these same people, like you said, go back into office at all. Okay. We have to not only keep them out,

1:00:26 but we also have to make sure that our elections are investigated by real investigators who have no ties to any of these former people at all. And most definitely, and I'm going to call it like it is, they cannot be Israeli investigators investigating American elections, because that's exactly who investigated 9-11. So we should all be asking, why did we need those same people to investigate Surfside and who? We should start planning. Who is going to investigate these

1:01:01 elections? Lloyd, do you have anybody in mind? Well, I think I have the simple answer to the whole scenario. And that is that one of the emphasis of this case is to strip their immunity that they've given themselves. Article 6 of the Constitution is very clear. It says that officers shall be bound by oath. And no, no, no. Sorry. And if that's okay.

1:01:32 Listen, we're real around here, Lloyd. We're all regular humans here. It's about my battery going dead, but I think we're okay. Oh, Lordy. So it's about the oath of office, and they've given themselves immunity. USC Code Title 28 gives them immunity, and it's an unconstitutional statute. So this case would strip immunity from federal, state, and local officials.

1:02:04 And once that is stripped, they'll be bound by oath, and they will be able to be sued. The whole defense that the U.S. attorneys were bringing to this case, excuse me, was was immunity. I mean, they were basically admitting wrongdoing. And so it was all about immunity. It's like, no, immunity. If we have a constitution with Article six requiring the oath be binding and that hasn't been amended out of existence, then we still have, you know, then we then we have accountability and any statute, federal or state or local that gives them immunity can be will be dissolved.

1:02:41 And then we have a whole new political climate, a whole new political climate that when you enter office, you're going to realize you can't do just whatever you want. You realize that you're going to have to know you're going to have to have an understanding of the Constitution. You know, in California, there are perjury laws that protect politicians where it says perjury is this, that. But but they exclude politicians in the oath of office from being charged with perjury when they swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.

1:03:12 And they've never read it. There's a violation right there. There's a perjury charge right there. So this would turn everything upside down and people that went into would go into public office would only be those who are more accountable people. So this could completely change the whole scenery. yeah i was looking at i was looking at this article and what um in there it said it states the date july 1 2022 u.s attorneys motion to dismiss the u.s attorneys file a motion to dismiss lawyers lawsuit on the grounds that defendants are protected under title 28 which gives defendants

1:03:48 sovereign immunity from any lawsuits relating to actions of treason while serving in the capacity of their office really the u.s attorneys also file a notice of appearance on behalf of all the defend is making them the official attorneys on record instead of representing them specially. Yeah. Wow. It sounds like. Yeah. People can go to seven discoveries dot com and they can download the complaint that shows all the reliefs, all the causes of action, everything we're accusing them of and also all the evidence from the congressional records.

1:04:21 A lot of great information there for a dollar donation. You can download that. I have a question for you, and I highly recommend that everybody do this. What what should we be doing regarding our state governments? You know, even though, you know, maybe our selection selected group of politicians are in. But should we file these, you know, some of these same complaints to our state governments? Well, I think right now let's see what happens with the Supreme Court case.

1:04:51 And if this if this is adjudicated the way we want it to be, then this would be the legal authority where you could bring a lawsuit against any representative on any level. And if they if they pled immunity, you have you have a Supreme Court decision that would just wipe that right out with a motion with a full semi judgment motion. I mean, the accountability that this would create is I don't think people understand how. I do, but I definitely don't think anybody else does. So I'll be in prayer for this.

1:05:24 I mean, I'm looking at a picture of you and the the litigation. I used to work for a bunch of law firms, high profile law firms. The litigation is volume is it's like I mean, the paper alone must have been expensive. Yeah, we've been told that a million to two million dollars easy if we've had a law firm do what we've what we've done. And yeah, and attorney's fees. Yeah. So you have to you have to print on a certain paper you have to buy. It has to be. Oh, yeah. It has to be. Yeah.

1:05:55 When my brother first did this, it cost him five thousand dollars just for someone to coach him on how to format it for the Supreme Court. And so this 388 defendants using the U.S. Postal Service to access process servers to all the defendants. So 388 packets delivered to the post office staff who are waiting to process the service. yeah that's over seven thousand dollars in processing fees yeah that's over seven thousand you know something that's interesting my my lawsuit that started to be served by the u.s

1:06:25 marshal service for free because when i filed mine and it was started they started to serve it they the congress had locked themselves down and wouldn't let anyone in right so because of that we couldn't hire a process server or anyone to go in so what happens the court has to allow us to go through the U.S. Marshal Service, the only ones that can go in, and it's free. So that started happening. That was happening on March 31st, I believe, 2021. And then the court called it back. It's like these people are starting to get served according to docket. And then they called it back

1:06:57 and said, oh, that was a mistake. Brunson's complaint is deficient. You know, just ignore that. And I'm thinking, well, Nancy Pelosi was one of the ones that, according to the docket, got served. And she would have probably seen it on April 1st. So she probably would have thought it was an April Fool's joke. I mean, it's just kind of crazy, but now the real thing is happening. More like an April Fool's nightmare, Nancy Pelosi, Nancy Pants. Well, yeah, there are a lot of elements to this. So one of the charges is a conspiracy, civil conspiracy. And think about it. 380 defendants have been represented by an attorney.

1:07:33 They may not even realize that they're in a case as defendants of the Supreme Court right now. I don't even know if they realize that there might be a couple that are starting to find out about it, but they've already been they've already they already have a representative. Their council has already turned down, signed a waiver, a waiver. Why would that happen? Divine intervention. Divine intervention. Well, yeah, divine intervention. It's just it's just I think she did the right thing. Maybe she's got some moral, moral integrity.

1:08:08 Her oath to the Constitution. Exactly. That's the thing. Anyone that fights against this is actually, even if it's a judge, is fighting against empowering the Constitution and empowering the oath of office. So it's it's a two edged sword more than that. Yeah. Yeah. And we're dealing, you know, we're hearing a lot of cases, you know, even family law cases where they've tried to use the family law system, you know, to set precedents that people, a lot of people don't realize how case law is made. And when you do win this case, and I'm going to say when, not if, but when, this will change the way we are able to look at things. And, you know, we have to keep in mind, every country is also looking at us, too.

1:08:52 You know, so, you know, Loy, I mean, I just can't even tell you how much I appreciate you and your brothers enough, you know, trying and following through because this is not an easy process. You know, I was saying early on that, you know, Megan Walsh has had the issue with her family law case against her own father who has taken her children. And she says illegally her children have been trafficked by the same system that America calls free under Ron DeSantis.

1:09:24 And, you know, they are taking money for these children and claiming, you know, in the best interest of these children. And I have a I mean, literally, I have mothers who are trying to fight their case. Two of them are in Supreme Court right now. And, you know, this is a very difficult process. What you guys have done, taking it all the way to Supreme Court, it's costly, difficult. And I just want to commend you on that and tell you, you know, as an American, I'm so appreciative of you and your brothers for for fighting the fight that none of us realized

1:10:00 could even be done. that does have the, no matter what it changes, it's going to change our world because we're all going to learn like, okay, if that didn't work, let's try this. Let's shift this. Let's work together to make it happen. So, you know, but we can all be in prayer that the SCOTUS actually does the right thing. Excellent. And what you're doing is wonderful because that's how people learn about it. And it's about Thomas Jefferson said the true corrective for constitutional abuse is education.

1:10:33 And that's what you're doing. You're educating people. People need to know the power in the constitution. There's a lot of power in there. And then if they can go to 7discoveries.com and I have a book, a little pocket-sized book on the constitution. It has Q&A in the back. It has concepts in there that have never been published before. That's my claim. And I'm finding that people are excited to hear these power clauses that have never been recognized. I have a friend who, she's in Alaska, and the FBI breached her house looking for Nancy Pelosi's computer.

1:11:13 She was never actually in the Capitol, and they seized her pocket constitution. What is that about? Hopefully they'll read it. Right? It's like somebody's stealing your Bible. You're like, all right. Go ahead, dig it. Maybe you'll read it. Yeah. Well, you know, an interesting concept that I make in my book is if you were to ask any representative to show you a clause in the Constitution that specifically, explicitly prohibits socialism, they wouldn't be able to do it unless they have my book.

1:11:44 So there are clauses in there that have been ignored for over 200 years. There are clauses in there that we need to be able to, you know, reference. You know, we hear about the First Amendment, the Second Amendment. But seriously, have you ever heard anyone, any representative reference something in the Constitution to push back against people like Bernie Sanders and others that are promoting socialism? Well, so it's amazing. Yeah, they try to distract us with First Amendment, Second Amendment, you know, and try to prevent us from getting messages out.

1:12:14 You know, like, you know, even even on the Balenciaga piece that, you know, people are so concerned about now, we wouldn't have even been able to share some of the information regarding that on Twitter, even, you know, before Elon Musk took over and not saying he's definitely not a savior. We're not, you know, but, you know, for now we're going with the free speech platform that we have. But without that, you know, without that, without the guns, but then we do have to start looking into every single thing and not being afraid.

1:12:46 You know, they fear porn people with a pandemic for, you know, over two and a half years now. And it's time for people to wake up and realize that we do have a constitution to stand by and we can we can make it happen. I think that's a wonderful thing about your family and your brothers. It's, it's, you all stepped up, you know, no matter what it took, you all stepped up and got together and said, no, this is not right. And we're going to do something about it. And so I'd like to thank all of your brothers and yourself for doing that.

1:13:17 Tell them all Penny LA said, thank you so very much. Yes. Oh, thank you. Thank you. And please go to the, tell people to go to the website. They'll learn a lot, a lot. We'll definitely mention that on other episodes too, Loy. we were mentioning earlier today and everything so what right now I mean we basically just need to be in prayer for a Friday the conference and so the conference with SCOTUS is Friday correct it's not scheduled yet there is a conference Friday but it's not scheduled that this will be a part of it they could put this on who knows when and so hopefully the docket at some point

1:13:51 will reflect when it's going to go into conference but because of the level of urgency that this is and national security issues attached to it, they could be doing things behind closed doors. We just don't know. Right. And we hope and pray that they are. So I have one question for you because I know that this is going to get a lot of independent news like ourselves, but has anybody from Mainstream called to ask you about it?

1:14:21 There are some phone calls that we haven't, we need to check because we had a lot of phone calls And the service didn't wasn't able to record all the messages. So we need to finish going through some of the phone numbers. So as far as we know, no, not yet. We'll make sure to tweet this to some journalists that that we know of to see if they know about it. They're willing to cover it, which is ABC, NBC and New York Post and a couple of believe it or not at New York Times.

1:14:52 So hopefully, you know, they'll at least cover it because if they want democracy in our republic, you know, there's no place to start than the Constitution. OK, now a lot of cases go to conference. I mean, thousands of them go to conference and about one in a hundred make it through conference. So if we make it through conference, we're one in a hundred cases. so we've come a long way to get to this point and they've characterized it as something that

1:15:22 they want so we believe there's a good chance that it'll and since it's not a political thing and it's just about investigating crimes when they're reported we feel like there's a good chance for it to make it out so once it makes it through conference yeah i think that's when the mainstream media would really you know want to jump all over this so let me ask you a question So, you know, when we're going back to this, right, so, you know, when there has to be this investigation, I think we all we all also have to think logically regarding this.

1:15:53 So this investigation is going to occur while these people are in office. So at the same time, how do we we as we the people in the Constitution make sure that it's not them investigating themselves? That's that's well. They won't have immunity if this case moves forward or they'll be sued. I mean, we could still bring lawsuits against the individuals. That's what the Democrats do. And I'm not saying this is a Democrat or Republican kind of thing. It's like we need to we need to use the courts.

1:16:24 We need law firms that will step up and provide opportunities for cases. There have been some real serious cases where it was obvious that the police went into the wrong house. A family member was killed here in Utah. they took it to court and there's nothing they could do with they couldn't be compensated because of immunity statutes here in utah and then you have some like the george floyd thing where there's criminal and he gets all these the family gets a ton of money and it's like the attorneys stop they it's so expensive to they they go to they go to federal court or state court and then they get

1:16:58 they get dismissed and they don't take it up the ladder and probably because it's so expensive To go to the Supreme Court, you cannot take a case to the Supreme Court for less than half a million dollars. You just can't do it. And so the fact that my brother was able to do it, you know, is just incredible. But that's the problem, the resources. But there should be lawyers and teams of, you know, law firms that should be there, a real constitutional civil liberties union instead of the communist one that we have going out there that's causing a lot of trouble.

1:17:30 And British-owned bar. I mean, we have a British. We basically are running on a British, the British accreditation registration system. Every barred attorney is run by the British. They're all afraid of losing their bar numbers and their bar license. And they are afraid of what's to happen. But the reality is if they if these attorneys don't start stepping up, I mean, they're going to be the ones that are, you know, basically forcing and holding everyone's hand directly into the next gulag or, you know,

1:18:02 in our country becoming communist because they wouldn't stand up for what they are supposedly, you know, educated to do, but being educated by the same system that's actually, you know, ruling the world at the same time. So is there anything, Loy, anything else that you want to make sure that the public knows. And then I hope that we can have you back on to give some updates as they, as they come about. So I want to thank you for answering my text.

1:18:36 Oh, I think we lost them. You're good. You're just like kind of sideways right now. We're like this. a great time to try to stretch my neck a lot is going on and this is just kind of a makeshift opportunity while in the middle of some other stuff thank you so very much for taking the time out of your day to you know come on and

1:19:11 to share this with everyone and i'll get your number from christy and see if we can maybe uh have you on the dark outpost as well. Okay. Yeah. We'll do that. And, uh, and again, go to seven discoveries.com. There's a ton of information there. And, uh, if you have any other questions, yeah. Yeah. Thank you so very much. And again, thank you guys for the fight. Thank you for, for even encouraging us to, you know, go pro se and take things all the way. And, um, I hope that, that our audience will at least leave things with one thing that you can do

1:19:43 but a regular person can do it. You can learn. And it's not as hard as they want it to make it out like it is, but it is very expensive. And for the people who are, you know, still supporting some of the cabal industry, I highly encourage them to go on and throw a few bucks your way. Oh, great. Thanks. To, to help. Yeah, for sure. Because I'm going to do the same myself, because I know how much it costs to do these things.

1:20:15 And if we all just pitch in, we can all win. Oh, sure. And even if someone goes to the site and donates a dollar, we know that they're out there supporting us. So just, you know, people go donate $1 at 7discoveries.com and download the complaint for a dollar. That's fantastic. So thank you. Yes. Well, I think people don't realize the momentum that they give you when they just go on and donate even a dollar. because at least, like you said, you know that they're there. And it's excitement when you're going through something like this and you're working so hard at it.

1:20:46 And nobody responds with anything, not even a thanks. It's kind of like, oh, my goodness, you know, are we actually doing the right thing? You don't want to feel like everybody's asleep. Well, Lori, thank you so much. It's like a vote in favor of this, a dollar vote, sort of, yeah. Yep, absolutely. Well, let us know if anytime you need to get a message out, we're here. we appreciate you and just let us know if there's anything we can do for you okay will do thank you very much thank you very much

1:21:17 and your family thank you whoa pity wow exciting yes very I know it's like what we needed to hear precedence precedent case on the presidents right I mean well not only the presidents the exciting part about it is it's all the people that could be criminals. And, you know, like I said, my biggest concern is who's going to investigate these people, you know, because they always tend to find, you

1:21:47 know, their friends to investigate them. Of course, they find nothing. But I think, you know, God is always in control. And like he said, you know, he is, you know, part author of our constitution. Yes. In terms of what we have, and we basically have to stand up for it. Unfortunately, we've had too many precedent cases that actually were against what God stands for. And I think the McMartin case was one of those. So, you know, a precedent case that would actually stand for the people and for righteousness and for truth and for justice would be awesome.

1:22:23 Absolutely. Absolutely. Penny. Well, listen, do you have anything else that you want to go over today or you want to say? I just I just got something from John Carmen from it. It actually was from Infowars, but it says CEO of Balenciaga parent company owns auction site that sells child sex mannequins with genitalia for faces. Yeah. Oh, there's so much. Listen, when it comes to even the company wide things, I think we vote. I vote we wait and go over that tomorrow. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. I'm just I'm just throwing it out there.

1:22:56 Yeah, the company is like so deep. I mean, it's so deep. And I'll do my best to explain how these advertising companies work and how they have so much influence. And then how agencies like I own an advertising agency, how we as regular people with morals, you know, we're we don't get these jobs. We don't get these opportunities. Like if you won't capitulate to some things that they want, you know, you pretty much have to step away.

1:23:27 And some people won't step away from the money. I step away from the money. It does not, you know, it does not bother me. I don't need their money. God will provide me what I need. And that's it. I'm not I'm not about, you know, the next car or the next, you know, the next jacket that I'm going to wear, you know, and spending that much. I would much rather give to somebody like yourself, help Megan with her case, even help the, you know, the Loy family, Loy's family to, you know, even to keep everybody encouraged right now.

1:24:04 You know, that's an important thing, you know. So if the dollar isn't that much to ask. So the dollar actually is more of like showing that you actually are in support. So I would encourage everyone to go to the website that you had streaming before you added up there and you'll put it below, right? I think we also, you know, I think we're both really bad at, you know, at marketing ourselves. You know, some people, you know, want to point fingers and say, you know, we just talk about ourselves. We talk about our experiences, but one of the things we don't do is you have shepherd

1:24:39 entertainment.blogspot.com where people can sign up for your blogs. Correct. I know you haven't written in a while. I mean, it's just free. So you don't need to sign up for anything. You just go there and read some of my research and then do your own research because this is my research. And these are the conclusions that I've come to based upon my life and my experience within my life. And I'm sharing it and just, you know, use it as a, as a, a jumping off point. You know, like Johnny Cerucci, his books are fabulous.

1:25:11 You should go Google Johnny Cerucci and look at him on Amazon and take a look at his books and take a look at what he has to say. Yeah. Because he's a former Marine, you know, I think, you know, maybe we didn't give him the best introduction because sometimes we always assume that people already know the next person, but he is a Marine. So when, when we're talking about supporting our veterans and Marines, he's just one of the more awake Marines, I'll say, because he has not allowed them to silo him. So, you know, it is very encouraging.

1:25:41 I want our audience to know it's very encouraging. For me, it's very encouraging whenever I see like new signups, like on PatriotsPerspective.com, when I just even see emails and I see people reading it, it's all free. There's no charge. Just enter your email address. And basically you're going to get an email a day, which basically contains all the articles and research that I post. And then I also have several other authors that we promote and several other podcasters.

1:26:12 And Penny, I also have your work coming up there as just a reminder, you know, for people to be able to get reminders in their inbox. And all that, it does cost me money to send people emails. But at the same time, if I'm going to do the work, I want to know that people are reading the emails. You know, that's important. Or reading the work. so you can sign up there if you want to buy something from me christytasker.com i ship gifts all over the world my mom is actually she hand letters and hand writes notes in the gifts

1:26:47 that is a way you know we see that as a way to impart you know a nice gift to people and actually care you know so you know it is caring people and i do know the people that actually make my products, unlike a lot of brands, they are good people and sweet people. And a lot of times they're the ones who are confirming some of the information, like from China, from Bangladesh, from Vietnam, from the Philippines. You know, not only do I source with them, but I also confirm a lot of

1:27:22 the news that we're hearing with those same people. So if people are just wondering how we're all connected and that kind of thing. And I know David has dark outpost.com, right, Penny? And you can sign up on dark outpost.com to make sure you're alerted every time there's the news that comes on. And you guys start broadcasting every day from 10 until two, correct? When when David is in town? Yes, it's 10 to two Eastern Standard Time and nine to one Central Time.

1:27:53 yeah and we're on Monday through Saturday yeah and you guys have lots of great research great information great people so if you're looking for something to watch instead of your mainstream tell live vision please do tune in to the dark outpost because you have so much research there Penny I so admire you you know I love you and think that you are amazing when it comes to putting together the news. And I know that you have more than we can even go over. I mean, I'm an exuberant

1:28:25 individual. So, you know, I like to try and get as much into a show as possible, which it's not always that it's not always possible, but we have tomorrow. Yeah, we have tomorrow, Penny. Thank you. And I really love you. And I thank you for taking the time to share everything that you've learned. And if, you know, I think I had up on the screen earlier that I know I have sent you gift cards before on Amazon, your Amazon gift cards. I had the banner from where I actually use that to buy my computer.

1:28:55 Yeah. And that's the reason I'm like, hey, there's no better time of year to support research because we are not journalists who have everything handed to us and we don't work for the corporations, the corporations. separations. So anyway, Penny, any closing words for today? I just want to tell everyone to pray about this SCOTUS proposal and pray that justice and righteousness are served and pray that in the community, those that are coming forward with truth, please listen to them with open hearts.

1:29:33 not everyone shares the same opinion but everyone has an opinion and it's necessary that we listen to all opinions in order to make discernments so i try to myself i've i now have become an unbiased investigative journalist in which i have to weigh all sides of the equation so that's something that we strive to bring you all all points from a different uh different walks of life. That's right. Me too, Penny. And I try to investigate in the terms of, you know, I want

1:30:07 to do unto others as I want to have others do unto me. And no matter what race, religion, sexual preferences, he, him, sure, her, K, Y, X, Y, Z, whatever you are, I don't really care. So that's the thing. I don't really care. I'm not making fun. I don't care. It does not matter. if humans are humans and that's it. And the Bible tells us that we're supposed to do unto others as we want others to do unto us. And that's the way I like to treat people. And I hope that people will do the same to us, Penny.

1:30:39 I think so. That's a great premise. And I want to thank everyone for tuning in today. And I want to thank my beautiful friend, Christy Tasker, for everything that she does. She's just an awesome individual. And we'll see you again tomorrow. Okay. See you tomorrow, everybody. 12. We try to go live on Rumble, YouTube, and even LinkedIn while we can. Thanks, everybody. Make sure you do go to PatriotsPerspective.com, sign up, and we'll see you tomorrow. I'm going to be a David. Christy out.

1:31:13 Shepherd out.