Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Avoid the tech tyrants. Discover one truth at a time.

AVOID CENSORSHIP

TODAY'S CONSPIRACY THEORIES TOMORROW'S NEWS- DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX FOR FREE.

We don’t spam or send useless info. Unsubscribe anytime.

Part 10: President John F. Kennedy assassination attempt | Michelle Stefanick answers questions

sponsored by

Shop PP gear


In This Episode

Archived recording: Part #10 -president John F. Kennedy assassination attempt | Michelle Stefanick answers questions.

Hosts & Guests

Show notes

Episode Timeline

JFK Assassination Discussion: Part 10

Michelle Stefanick answers questions in part 10 of this archived discussion of the John F. Kennedy assassination. Use the related series links to continue through the other recordings.

Archived recording: Part #10 -president John F. Kennedy assassination attempt | Michelle Stefanick answers questions.

Watch the archived recording

Automatically generated transcript of the archived recording.

0:00 Again, I thank you for this opportunity. And based on all the excellent feedback and questions I've received to this point, this is now Part 10 of this multi-part series. As I prepared this PowerPoint called President John F. Kennedy Assassination Attempt, November 22, 1963, to assist with our further deep dive, including applicable visual photo, video clips, to accompany my remarks even deeper than my previous remarks.

0:34 And again, I want to hear your, your audience's questions, comments, and particularly your aha moments, okay? And again, it's because of your input, I now provide this additional part 10 to this PowerPoint to continue our journey. Ready to continue? And again, my conjecture is and remains, JFK was not assassinated on November 22nd, 1963.

1:04 What was proven on November 22, 1963, at that time, was the legal definition of conspiracy, the attempt to assassinate the President of the United States of America. In my previous remarks, including parts four and eight of this multi-part series, my remarks regarding Adolf Hitler and Hitler apparently not dying April 30th, 1945, as reported falsely to the entire world, with more and more evidence trickling out to this day, to this regard, this, adding the very pertinent and very relevant

1:50 additional context to what all this was, is really about. which now seems to be apparently supported

2:21 by recent declassified U.S. government files and documented in such documentaries as this History Channel's Hunting Hitler 26 episode series from 2015 to 2018 and Hunting Hitler the final chapter 2022. It's a two hour special these documentaries.

2:55 This History Channel Hunting Hitler series applicable investigation, including such as U.S. Army Special Forces, Tim Kennedy. And with that, and for those that are unaware, which I myself only recently became aware during the time frame of writing my own book, I highly recommend watching the entire 27 episodes.

3:29 episodes, Hitler surviving World War II and being relocated, where? To South America, with others saying to the United States of America, California to be more exact, and all with the complicity of the U.S. government, to include the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover even, the CIA, the Dulles brothers even, and the U.S. military, the U.S. Navy even, given Hitler didn't

4:04 walk over land to get to any of these supposed locations. So one has to ask who benefited, would benefit from Hitler's survival? So who authorized, ordered even, Hitler's survival relocation? British Prime Minister Winston Churchill? Could it have been German background U.S. Army first NATO Supreme Commander General Dwight D. Eisenhower himself? German-born FBI

4:38 Director J. Edgar Hoover? Certainly puts a whole different lens on things, doesn't it? Including General Patton's suspicious death. So again, if you haven't watched this History Channel Hunting Hitler series, I would recommend it. Interesting, isn't it? Given President Eisenhower's supposed top secret agreement with the CIA in what, the 1950s. Then with subsequent reports that Hitler then supposedly did die in February of 1962.

5:18 Wow. So wonder who authorized was involved with that death of Hitler? That hit even, right? Wait, and when was the Cuban Missile Crisis? Wow, wait a minute. Let's back up. When, how do you think JFK, the President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, became aware of Hitler's survival

5:49 relocation for the first time? I have my opinion. What is yours? When and how do you think President of the United States of America, John F. Kennedy, first became aware of Hitler's survival and relocation.

6:30 This now brings me to this. Thank you.

7:03 In my previous remarks, including part eight of this multi-part series, my remarks regarding the George H.W. Bush Wednesday, December 5, 2018 funeral envelopes. In my remarks, I raised so many questions, as did many of you, to include why did only the wives get the envelopes at the funeral? But wait, let's take this to an even higher level of questioning. Why in the world were the George H.W. Bush funeral envelopes even handed out to begin with? Who prepared them? George H.W. Bush himself? Or given his own son's reactions and involvement, did George W. Bush himself prepare them?

7:54 so why why were these George H.W. Bush funeral envelopes even prepared to begin with who ordered authorized all of this who by name including under oath George W. Bush was all involved in and why what is George W. Bush's understanding for these such George H.W. Bush funeral envelopes and all those specifically involved under oath,

8:26 each of their applicable understandings of why? And do all of these explanations match? All for the same reason, the same purpose? And if given out and handed out, the reasons are different and purposes are different, why? Are you starting to see where I'm going with all this? and for such open public display documented recordings of capturing reactions of those that

8:57 received the applicable George H.W. Bush funeral envelopes not orchestrated at all right not for a reason not for a specific purpose and all just simply coincidental you know just like the Abraham Zapruder from, right? All that just simply coincidental, not for any pre-orchestrated reason, specific purpose, other than just simply having his camera and then unexpectedly

9:28 capturing the events of November 22nd, 1963. And then what? Not shared with the public until years later, including to first Dan Rather privately, and then to Gerardo Rivera, who shared it openly and publicly for the whole world to see. Dan Rather stating it's not the same film he saw, and no reconciliation of that fact. So again, what is George W. Bush's

10:02 understanding of what and why the applicable reason explanation for his father's, his own father's, George H.W. Bush's funeral envelopes to that of all the others involved in the know, under oath, and in the public, open reconciliation of the explanations, reasons provided. Why? Why were these handed out? Speaking of George W. Bush, this now brings me to this.

10:57 Another documentary that I recently became aware of and provided extensive previous remarks. it's the august 2019 history channel 9-11 inside air force one documentary and based on its timing

11:34 released just less than a year after the george hw bush wednesday december 5th 2018 funeral envelopes and all the applicable youtube videos thereafter this august 2019 two-hour documentary feature documentary, tells the story of 9-11 from a unique vantage point inside Air Force One on its nine-hour journey from Florida across the country and finally home to Washington, D.C.,

12:13 featuring interviews with President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Chief of Staff Andrew Card, the pilot of Air Force One, Secret Service agents, as well as intelligence and military aides on board. again with statements comments testimonial statements personally made by President George

12:50 W. Bush himself Vice President Dick Cheney Chief of Staff Andrew Card and so many others oh and given all my previous remarks be sure to watch to the very end the ending to include the quote miscommunication noted at and not until the very end so again just like the George H.W. Bush Wednesday December 5th 2018 funeral envelopes what is George W. Bush's understanding real

13:26 understanding of the events of what happened to him on September 11, 2001, and all those specifically involved under oath, each of their applicable understandings of why. And do all these explanations match? All for the same reason? Same purpose? If differences of reasons and purposes, why are you starting to see where I'm going with all this because my watching this August 2019

13:59 documentary I got the distinct impression that the president of the United States of America President George W Bush on that day on September 11 2001 he knew something as did all those that appear on that documentary, but are they all on the same sheet of music, so to speak? Because from my perspective, to me, it appears that there is a real, a very real possibility

14:31 that the president of the United States of America, President George W. Bush, on that day, on September 11, 2001, at some point in all of this, was actually taken hostage, taken into custody. By whom? Or rather, by whom's? As it is quite apparent, as you watch and hear from these involved, from those involved, and as documented by their own

15:08 testimonial statements and actions. What do you think? Again, if you're not aware of or haven't yet watched this August 2019 History Channel 9-11 Inside Air Force One documentary, I highly recommend you do so. And to the very end, to see the miscommunication statement revealed only at the very end.

15:42 on February 1, 2019, I set out on a journey to write my book, and on June 11, 2020, I submitted the full unedited unpublished manuscript of over 700 pages with the Library

16:13 of Congress, the registration office. Its title at that time, always tell the truth until they don't like what you have to say, testimonial to a memoir of and by a U.S. Department of State Foreign Service Federal Crime Victims Rights Act protected middle-class nobody. The very next day, June 12, 2020, I submitted my signed contract intent with my publisher. And now, finally, after over two years of delay, it's publication.

16:49 Shorter in length and modification in title, supposedly finally in sight, a January 2023 publication date. But yet, regardless, the realization remained the same. My journey was not yet over. So many questions remain unanswered. And as a firsthand witness, of which I and only I am uniquely qualified and uniquely possess,

17:21 assess insight and perspective that can lead to the right answers by asking the right questions, pointing in the right direction, and from a federal auditor perspective, pulling the right strings. Because when you pull the right string, the entire sweater unfurls, or in this case, all the dots connect the entire truth that is revealed. And with that, instead, the realization that my journey was not yet over. As a crucial piece to a bigger puzzle, I was forced to peel

18:01 back layer after layer after layer like an onion, continue picking up breadcrumbs along the way, connecting more dots as these were or revealed to me as my journey continued. My hope is you continue along with me in this journey, this apparent yellow brick road of sorts journey of countless rabbit holes fitting more and more pieces of the puzzle together to see what all hides behind the curtain, exposing more light along the way, and to finally discover what all

18:35 this is really about. Where our journey leads may surprise us all. So now I want to share some clips. Very applicable and very relevant clips.

19:05 particularly given my previous remarks regarding the specific applicable individuals involved, their applicable backgrounds, and questions, so many questions that remain. and these clips are from All the President's Men the 1976 movie directed by Alan J. Pacula

19:37 with a screenplay by William Goldman based on the 1974 non-fiction book of the same name by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward and this pertains to the clips I'm going to be sharing anonymous source known as deep throat. We're going to start first at 806 to 1217.

20:15 Patient with me as I get to it. [Unclear speech]

20:52 Well, these two were assigned to it. Sorry? These two were appointed to the case. Only now it turns out that burglars have their own counsel. Burglars have their own counsel? That's right. It's kind of unusual, wouldn't you say? For burglars, it's unusual. Do you know the name of the counsel? I don't know. Some country club type. You have charged for eliciting prostitution at 1482 Street's throne class. They can get to the end of your service on the parody of the soccer class. Your Honor, this is soccer class. and pass a new live report of hearing appearances when over you.

21:25 I think we've got an off-campus exception to be suggested. Excuse me, what is your name? I'm Bob Woodward of the Washington Post. Markham. Markham. Markham, are you here in connection with the Watergate for a reason? I'm not here. Okay. clearly not am here but only as an individual attorney who is mr. Starkey do you have any

22:01 whatever you want you have to get from here and nothing what is it Starkey is team mr. Starkey was very helpful for Cuban Americans and another man James W McCord I told you inside I have nothing more to say I understand what I don't

22:35 understand is how you got here I assure you there's nothing very mysterious involved well a little while ago I was talking to a couple of the lawyers assigned to represent the burglars no they never would have been assigned to represent the burglars had anyone known that the burglars had arranged for their own counsel my burglars couldn't arrange for their own counsel since they never made a phone call no one has should be here with why you here I don't want you take this personally mr. what would you do let's take you do that I just don't

23:09 have anything to say to one of the other men involved in the break-in call you What reason do you have to assume that there were other people involved in the rape? One of your clients was arrested with a walking talkie. They're not my clients. I don't want to talk about this anymore. You're a lawyer and you're here.

23:40 One of the defendants, Mr. Barker and I met at a social occasion once. Where? I had nothing else to say. A Miami social occasion? Mr. Starkey says the Cubans were from Miami. James McCord, L63, Bernard Barker, L64, Regoel Gonzalez, L65, Regino Martinez, L66, Frank Starkes. Please step forward, Attorney Starkey, all charged with burglary due.

24:13 Mr. Starkey, we represent all five. Yes, Your Honor. And our all five gentlemen charged with burglary and the secondary. Yes, Your Honor. Your names please, and state your profession. Bernard Barker, anti-communist. Anti-communist. This is not your average professional. James McCoy, security consultant. Where? Government recently retired. Where? Government intelligence agency.

24:46 Where? CIA. Sturgis, right? Now next, I'm going to play from 31.17 to 41 minutes.

25:21 Again, 31 minutes, 17 seconds to 41 minutes. I'll go and play it start now.

25:51 He might confirm.

26:21 Thank you.

26:51 Yeah, I got it. My brand is saying Hunt looked for a fuck. White House A told me that Hunt was investigating Kennedy. Who was it?

27:21 Who was it? You want the name you mean? No, no. How senior? How am I at? I don't know titles. No special interest. No, we said the White House was investigating. No special interest. Jesus is a story stronger than that. We got a White House librarian who says come check out a whole lot of books.

27:51 We got a secretary in Colson's office. All right. Ben, that's a page one story. Stick it inside someplace. This is a goddamn important story. There's some harder information in that design. Bradley is sticking for the Kennedy. We didn't have it.

28:21 Oh, shit, we had it cold. No, we didn't. Why don't you say something? You think bitching about it is going to get the store where we want it? Throw it in the channel. yes this is woodward

29:03 i want to talk about watergate i know we're not going to talk about that subject we talked about wallace but this is different that was about the shooting of a man running for president. This is different. How? Not about this story. Don't call me again.

29:49 Wait a minute. Notice the envelope dropping from the newspaper? What does that remind you of? Just like the George H.W. Bush December 5th, 2008 funeral envelopes dropping out of the applicable programs, right?

30:27 Let's continue on. Amen.

31:14 [Unclear speech]

31:44 Okay.

32:14 Thank you.

32:44 Thank you.

33:14 Where are you? Stuck. The story has stalled on us. And you thought I'd help? I'll never quote you. I wouldn't quote you even as an anonymous source. and you'd be on deep background.

33:49 You can trust me, you know that. Come on. Can you tell me what you know? You tell me what you know. Hunt worked for Colson at the White House. Hunt was investigating Kennedy at Chipper Quitting. That should tell you a lot. What else? We're beginning to hear a lot about a lawyer in the creek, Gordon Liddy.

34:38 Gordon Liddy was fired by Mitchell because he wouldn't talk to the FBI. You'll hear more. Let me talk. I was at a party once and a lady put his hand over a candle and he kept it there. He kept it right in the flame until his flash was burned. Somebody said, what's the trick? And the lady said, the trick is not minding.

35:14 The story is dry. All we've got are pieces. We can't seem to figure out what the puzzle is supposed to look like. John Mitchell designs as the head of Creek and says that he wants to spend more time with his family. That's bullshit. We don't exactly believe that. Oh, but it's touching. Forget the myths the media has created about the White House. The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things have got out of hand.

35:48 Hunt's come in from the cold. Supposedly he's got a lawyer with $25,000 in a brown paper bag. He followed the money. What do you mean? Where? Oh, I can't tell you that. But you could tell me that. No, I have to do this my way. you tell me what you know and i'll confirm i'll keep you in the right direction if i can but that's all just follow the money so now we're going to play this at one hour 34 minutes and seven seconds

36:33 to one hour 35 minutes and 36 seconds.

37:03 Again, one hour, 34 minutes and seven seconds to one hour, 35 minutes and 36 seconds. Almost there. As soon as you're done, we're going to do a story on all of you. Sir, there's just a couple of questions. Call my law officer for more. No question you properly identified him.

37:35 I said it right at the top. Did you know he was talking to a reporter? Yeah, but I think I woke him up. Any good notes? Prevade him. He really said that about Mrs. Graham. I'll cut the words here, tit, and print it. What? This is a family newspaper. You know, once when I was reporting, Lyndon Johnson's top guy gave me the word.

38:05 They were looking for a successor for J. Edgar Hoover. I wrote it, and the day it appeared, Johnson held a press conference and appointed Hoover head of the FBI for life. When he was done, he turned to his top guy, and the president said, Call Ben Bradley and tell him, fuck you. Hell, everybody said, You did it, Ben. You screwed up. You stuck us with Hoover forever. I screwed up. I wasn't wrong. How much can you tell me about Deep Throat?

38:39 How much do you need to know? You trust him? Yeah. I can't do the reporting for my reporters, which means I have to trust them. And I hate trusting anybody. Run that, baby. Okay. Now at 143.45 to 148.48.

39:30 I'm going to back us up a little bit. What's the topic for tonight? In my day it was simply known as the double cross.

40:03 In our present context, it means infiltration of the Democrats. So Gretti won't go on the record. But if he would, we know he would implicate Chapin. And I could put you inside the White House. Be specific. How high up? You're that fine enough for yourself.

40:38 I don't like newspapers. I don't care for inexactitude and shallowness. The creep slushman that financed the rat fucking, we just about got that nailed down. I don't know how to change caps. Yeah. Because the FBI know what we know.

41:10 Are you just justice? Why haven't they done anything? If it didn't deal directly with the break-in, they didn't pursue. Who told them not to? Don't you understand what you're on to? Mitchell knew? Of course, Mitchell knew. Do you think something this size just happens?

41:41 Haldeman had to know too. You get nothing from me about Haldeman. Segretti said that. Don't concentrate on Segretti. You'll miss the overall. The letter that destroyed the Muskie Candidates. Did that come from inside? You're missing the overall. What overall? They were frightened of Muskie. Look who got destroyed. They wanted to run against McGovern. Look who they're running against.

42:14 They bugged. They followed people. False press leaked fake letters. They canceled Democratic campaign rallies. They investigated Democratic private lives. They planted spies, stole documents, and on and on. Now, don't tell me you think this is all the work of little darned Socretti. The FBI and Justice know this.

43:06 Thank you.

43:36 Thank you.

44:06 Thank you.

44:36 And now, two hours, six minutes and 40 seconds to two hours, nine minutes, 20 seconds.

45:06 Oh, sorry. You've got to back that up a little bit.

45:36 Again, 2 hours, 6 minutes and 40 seconds to 2 hours, 9 minutes, 20 seconds. And I'll go ahead and turn it on from here.

46:06 Thank you.

46:36 [Unclear speech]

47:06 You let Haldeman slip away? Yes. You've done worse than let Haldeman slip away and get people feeling sorry for him. I didn't think that was possible. In a conspiracy like this, you build from the outer edges and you go step by step.

47:37 If you shoot too high and miss, everybody feels more secure. You put the investigation back months. We know that. And if we're wrong, we're resigning. Were we wrong? You'll have to find that out, won't you? Listen, I'm tired of your chicken shit games. I don't want hints. I need to know what you know.

48:19 It was a Halderman operation. The whole business was run by Halderman. The money, everything. It won't be easy getting at him. He was insulated. You'll have to find out how. Mitchell started doing covert stuff before anyone else. The list is longer than anyone can imagine. It involves the entire U.S. intelligence community,

48:49 FBI, CIA, and justice. It's incredible. cover-up had little to do with Watergate. It was mainly to protect the covert operations. It leads everywhere. Get out your notebook. And again, given my conjecture as to who Deep Throat really is, was, and what

49:20 Deep Throat really refers, really referred to, and even a parent at that time, wasn't it? So why didn't U.S. Navy Office of Naval Intelligence background Ben Bradley and Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, given my understanding that Bernstein never ever personally met with anonymous source Deep Throat, only U.S. Navy background Bob Woodward did, why didn't they, Woodward and Bernstein, continue on to follow the money but stopped

49:58 instead once Nixon resigned? So why didn't Woodward and Bernstein continue to follow the money at that time to this day? which as a result has resulted in this very pertinent,

50:31 very relevant portion of the introduction to my soon-to-be after over two years of purposeful and intentional delay in publication of my book, quote in the 1976 movie all the president's men anonymous source known as deep throat stated that quote the cover-up had little to do with watergate it was mainly to protect the covert operations

51:02 end quote sidebar note d.b cooper not not being a member of the intelligence community law enforcement nor military, I am not and was not privy to nor involved in any covert operations. This crucial insight was also provided by Deep Throat, quote, to follow the money. And that is where I fit in. Though I did not ask for any of this, I found myself to be a tiny hub on a deep

51:33 state wheel with the spokes, the U.S. Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigations, and the military all connecting to me. Why me? Due to information and insight I acquired through the years of just doing my job as a federal auditor and then as a Foreign Service Financial Management Specialist, anyone in law enforcement, particularly the FBI, knows that information obtained during an audit, particularly a federal

52:07 audit is a protected activity, but yet I was not protected. Why? Because the deep state will stop at nothing to hide the corruption and crimes committed, particularly when it's regarding the funding linkages to covert operations, and despite the broader implications to our U.S. Constitution. my story has serious political overtones but it's not a political story it is my story it is the

52:39 story of what can happen when you innocently seek one truth but discover quite another and look at all that has indeed been innocently discovered along the way With this, more and more of the pieces of the puzzle are revealed and because all the dots are connected, which then brings me back to my conjecture that JFK was not assassinated on November 22nd, 1963.

53:11 With that, again, I want to show a clip from the video that I showed previously. JFK, the Mob, CIA, and the Eight Paid Assassins YouTube video. Publication date, May 11, 2017. Its entirety is 1 hour 25 minutes and 36 seconds.

53:41 that I first became aware of on Thursday, Thursday, September 30th, 2021, published by British producer Francis R. Connolly. I will play 4458 and silly drawings which everyone realized did not line up anywhere near the school book depository.

54:18 With the autopsy over, Mrs. Kennedy and the President's brother were shown the body prepared for burial. Not surprisingly, they were wholly unconvinced by legate attempts to make a Dallas police officer look like the President of the United States. Witnesses there at the time said Bobby scoffed and said, it doesn't look anything like him. while Mrs. Kennedy became adamant. It isn't Jack, she declared. That looks like something you'd find in Madame Tussauds' Washington Museum.

55:02 So look at that. seems JFK's own wife, Jackie, and his own brother, RFK, Robert F. Kennedy, were not convinced either. So now the question being, if they weren't convinced, why are you? As I remarked previously, when I was on my first excursion tour with the Foreign Service from the United States Department of State's Office of Inspector General

55:34 as Regional Financial Management Officer at Embassy Yaoundé Cameroon from 1993 to 1995, I met Ruth Singer, the spouse of my Embassy Yaoundé U.S. Agency for International Development USAID colleague, Derek Singer. Ruth being the sister of JFK's speechwriter and one of JFK's closest advisors, Theodore Ted Sorensen.

56:05 Years later, after attending Renaissance Weekend in Charleston, South Carolina over the 2006-2007 Christmas holiday, I personally met Ted Sorensen. Just about two years after that, in the 2008-2009 time frame, while I was attending the U.S. Army War College resident class in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, I initiated Ted Sorensen to come and speak to my U.S. Army War College class.

56:38 Because of my acquaintance, I read numerous of Ted's books. In particular, I read this one.

57:16 in particular, and based on my previous remarks, his book, Kennedy, published in 1965. The first time I read it a while back, it was for leisure, and of recent, a few times now, for additional insight and research. Throughout the book, this particular 1965 Ted Sorensen book contained what I considered aspects of particular interest, some real significance, particularly

57:52 pages 629 to 633. And then one day I read and reread pages 629 to 633. Oh my goodness, there it is in plain sight, black and white print. So with that, based on what I consider very pertinent and very relevant insight, my discovery, an apparent direct message, coding of sorts, clue in plain sight, but also located at

58:32 the Arlington National Cemetery and contained on pages 629 to 633 of Ted Sorensen's 1965 book, Kennedy. So again, for those that have not read Ted Sorensen's 1965 book, Kennedy,

59:02 I highly recommend you do so, particularly pages 629 to 633. Because based on this passage from Tent Sorensen's JFK speechwriter and one of JFK's closest trusted advisors, apparently buried alongside and along with as my conjecture is and remains at JFK's grave site at

59:34 Arlington National Cemetery is not only Dallas police officer J.D. Tippett the real and only murdered body of November 22nd, 1963, along with JFK's real intact brain proving he was not assassinated, along with the applicable supporting documentation, names even perhaps, of JFK's very small, limited, in-the-know group of U.S. Army Special Forces operators directly sanctioned

1:00:12 and authorized by and directly involved with this applicable JFK's, our President of the United States of America's, the Commander-in-Chief's own Black operation for his own survival from the November 22, 1963 assassination attempt on his very own life. Together, all rest accordingly

1:00:43 in a place of honor in Arlington National Cemetery, the JFK's grave site, in quotes, at Arlington National Cemetery. Thank you.

Do Your Own Research

sign up for news

Trending Interviews

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Add New Playlist

Avoid the tech tyrants. Discover one truth at a time.

AVOID CENSORSHIP

TODAY’S CONSPIRACY THEORIES TOMORROW’S NEWS- DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX FOR FREE.

We don’t spam or send useless info. Unsubscribe anytime.