Is your employer asking you for a vaccination card or vaccine exemption letter?
Below you’ll find a tried and tested vaccination exemption letter used by many people since the plandemic vaccine mandates begin to emerge. Below is an exact letter that you can copy and paste into an email. I also advise that you send this to your letter via certified mail with a return receipt or hand-deliver it to the employer’s human resource office and ask them to sign or stamp a copy of the letter with their signature, printed name, date, and time. Use the letter below, but you’ll need to replace the all caps letters with your specific information.Two Different Vaccination Exemption Letters Below That You Can Copy, Paste & Send To Your Employer Certified & Via Email
- Please note, there are two vaccination exemption letters below.
- You should copy and paste only ONE letter to send to the employer. I have included both letters to help you find the best letter for you, depending on your relationship with the employer.
Personalized Vaccination Exemption Letter Written To Use When an Employee Has a Personal Relationship With the Owner, Employer, or Human Resouces
Religious Vaccination Exemption Letter
[OWNER’s NAME OR HUMAN RESOURCE PERSON’S NAME]
Please pardon the length of this email as you know it’s not like me to write this much. I am firm in my religious beliefs, and I am concerned about misinformation circulating about an experimental vaccine.
While I do not think the [COMPANY NAME] mandate is legal, nor am I willing to partake in an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccination that “may” reduce the spread of COVID-19.
Your mandate for all employees to receive vaccinations by [ENTER ANY DEADLINES STATED BY THE EMPLOYER] is rather alarming, considering the FDA has NOT approved this vaccination nor conducted proper human trials. I am not sure if you are aware, but I understand that even animals died when injected with this so-called vaccine. Many doctors and leading Nobel Peace Prize-Winning scientists and microbiologists have also spoken out regarding COVIDcures, and others state this vaccine is NOT a vaccine at all. I’ve tried to include the links to my findings to make your job a little easier, along with alarming statements.
Did you know that the CDC said that “80% of the COVID-19 Patients were vitamin D deficient“? Are you going to mandate we all take vitamin D? I recommend you consider it. Seriously. It sounds like a small no-brainer, but evidently, zinc, vitamin D, and vitamin C deficient people contract COVID-19.
I am very concerned for you and the legalities for [COMPANY NAME]. We are not in the medical field, nor do we service a lot of clients daily. Some employees like me work from home. I’m over 3,000 miles away from the home office [INSERT OR CHANGE ANYTHING REGARDING YOUR WORK SITUATION HERE].
To mandate an unknown health risk, whether conspiracy or true, is simply participating in tyranny or caving to the fears of part of your employees when others are more than happy to work as normal, whether people choose to be vaccinated or not. To put everyone’s mind at ease, I would find it more beneficial for employers worldwide to put out facts on both sides, such as Johns Hopkins: COVID Has Had No Effect On US Death Rate.
Employers much larger than [COMPANY NAME] who have placed mandates on employees are being sued. Even those that come into contact with numerous people daily. Check out this lawsuit where Los Angeles Unified School District is being sued by their employees because the school district mandated a vaccine.
If you wish, I will visit my personal healthcare providers and doctors and obtain a health exemption letter. When I called to schedule my appointment, they found it alarming that I was making an appointment to obtain a medical letter for a company mandate. That is one of the reasons I feel obligated to help you protect the company from potential lawsuits and make sure that we are not unknowingly sending coworkers to an early grave. My doctor’s office seemed especially alarmed when they found out that no matter the COVID-19 pandemic or not that I always work from home and rarely even visit the office.
When researching my own, I quickly found out that this Vaccine is an ongoing human experiment and not even authorized by the FDA other than under Emergency Use Authorization. Come to find out, the ingredients such as aborted male tissue are contained in the Jansen, Johnson & Johnson vaccine, and the other two happen to have an mRNA vaccine. Did you realize there has never been a successful mRNA vaccine? I found that stunning.
Without a shadow of a doubt, my Christian religious beliefs do not permit me to partake in such a human technology trial or participate in humanity’s consumption.
[COMPANY OWNER’S OR BOSS’S NAME], I love working with you, and I appreciate you making every effort to feel you’re doing your part to save humanity. I want to be clear in my hopes in writing this detailed letter are first and foremost to ask you to consider my work ethic and deliverables for [COMPANY NAME] alone vs. any medical or religious letter. Clearing and passing are what the Germans did in WWII. You are better than that. My work ethic and deliverables alone should be more than are enough to keep my job.
I understand that others, along with misinformation in the media and part of the medical community being silenced by BIG TECH, are not easy for many people who watch mainstream media daily.
I realize some you mentioned are strong-arming you into creating a “safe place where everyone feels safe” [INSERT ANY TERMS THE COMPANY HAS USED IN THE QUOTES] because maybe they have learned they like working from home vs. in the office. I can’t say I blame them. I enjoy working for you from home too. The difference is – you hired them to work in the office just like you hired me to work 3,000 miles away in my house. [YOU MAY ELIMINATE THIS LINE OR SECTION IF YOU DON’T WORK FROM HOME – BELIEVE IT OR NOT, EMPLOYERS ARE ASKING WORK-AT-HOME EMPLOYEES THAT LIVE THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY TO GET THE JAB.]
You nor any other employer should require a mass vaccination for everyone. For goodness sake, what if you were unknowingly committing genocide? I realize you wouldn’t hurt a fly, but you must realize that for some people’s bodies, this experiment is not going well at all. I recommend watching this doctor talk about the shots, how it’s affecting people, and where to get factual information.
Aside from either of my medical knowledge or religious beliefs, most of us who work at [COMPANY NAME] are women. As women, we promote my body, my choice. For me, personally, both go hand in hand with my religious beliefs.
This shot, the vaccine, or whatever it’s being marketed to be, does not align with my religious beliefs, and I may be submitting a letter exercising my religious exemption as well as my medical exemption so that you have double what you need. I do NOT consent to take it.
Per the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces Federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination, employers MUST offer religious and disability accommodations to vaccine requirements. Either way, I will be sure to submit anything you should consider by your mandated deadline of July 31, 2021. I hope that communicating that alone is an acceptance to respect my health, privacy, and strong religious beliefs.
[YOU MAY NEED TO ALTER THIS PARAGRAPH BASED ON YOUR SITUATION:]
I appreciate the offer to seek the advice of my doctor with a paid eight-hour day off. I have already consulted with him once a while back. Thankfully I was met with his truthfulness at the beginning of the Emergency Use Authorization. I was provided options to consider about the human study, and only recently, upon the Myriad mandate being pushed on our team calls with incentives, I explored a little more. I will need to return to my doctor and probably my pastor and a notary to get both the religious and medical letters so that you have no issues clearing me per the [COMPANY NAME] mandate.
My doctor’s appointment is booked for [INSERT DATE OF DOCTORS APPT IF THEY OFFER PAID TIME OFF FOR DR. VISITS]. Please do not schedule me in any meetings or expect a lot from me that day. When I went to the doctor, I waited for an extremely long time as my doctor takes emergency cases over booked appointments. I have asked him if I could just pick up a letter because I was trying to avoid going anywhere near the knowingly sick. Hopefully, I won’t have to go in, but in case I do, do you also need the medical exemption notarized?
I am attaching the Mandatory[COMPANY NAME] COVID-19 Vaccination Policy with my added notice to ensure as an employer, you are aware of the legal risk you are taking when mandating anyone take an Experimental Drug only made possible under the FDA Emergency Use Authorization. I feel obligated to make sure you know what I’ve learned in this process.
I’ve also attached the full Notice To Employers from the Health & Freedom Defense Fund. I found this when I became alarmed that any employer could enforce such a policy as it reminded me of my history lessons regarding the Holocaust. While there will never be another Holocaust, we must all learn from the experiments conducted and how the crimes against humanity started. We must never repeat history.
For your convenience, below the Nuremberg Code, as this mass vaccination breaks ALL of the Nuremberg Code points. In the process, as a lover of humanity, life, and freedom, I must advise you that you have been informed of the Nuremberg Code, which states:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
I, along with many of my colleagues, do not willingly consent to be a trial subject. Again – I DO NOT CONSENT.
Please be warned that you are breaking the Nuremberg Code now that you are fully aware and have confirmed receipt of this letter. Remember the Natzi Generals and every nurse that complied with delivering fatal injections and delivering mass genocide in the Nuremberg Trials went to Tribunals. You can, too, if there’s a Nuremberg 2.0
By mandating this mass vaccination and falling in the lap of the mainstream media and Dr. Fauci, who knowingly funded COVID-19, Certificate Of Vaccination IDentification released in 2019, you, your company, and everyone involved in promoting, harassing, or ushering people to an unknown outcome could be tried in Tribunals. Don’t succumb the tyranny, do your research to find doctors, lawyers, and many other organizations that have filed lawsuits and Freedom of Information Act requests to try to tell the truth. The media will not report this because they directly benefit from the BIG PHARMA fund.
Please do not worry. It is not me you should be concerned with. I have no time or intention of suing you, [COMPANY NAME], or anyone else. I want to be able to do my job without feeling forced or being involved in rewarding people for taking an experimental shot. Forgive me for my thoughts. When reading your communications and listening to your vaccination demands, I have felt like you were forcing people to line up on the Holocaust trains.
Sincerely, I pray none of our team members are harmed or injured by the vaccination. As you well know, I am definitely NOT an attorney, but after reading the Notice to Employers attached, it seems there were some potential mistakes made in the[COMPANY NAME] COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate. I hope my colleagues were informed and equipped with both sides of the medical professionals’ opinions, studies, and objectives. And I hope and pray they do not attempt to come after a small business such as[COMPANY NAME] if the vaccine injures them.
I very much look forward to [INSERT THE DATE THE EMPLOYER SAYS THEY WILL NOT MENTION VACCINATIONS], when you no longer mention or reward people for any medical decision. Then, there’s no telling how much more work we can all accomplish.
My best always,
[SIGN YOUR NAME WITH YOUR EMPLOYEE NUMBER AND OTHER DATA TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF]
Vaccination Exemption Letter PDF for Employers With Nuremberg Code Notice
Dear [HUMAN RESOURCE PERSON’S NAME OR THE COMPANY NAME]:
This serves as notice to all [EMPLOYER’S LEGAL NAME THAT APPEARS ON YOUR PAYCHECK OR EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT] that any compulsory COVID-19 requirement imposed upon any employee violates federal law.
1 Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”). However, the statute requires that: individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that is available and of their benefits and risks.
On December 11, 2020, the FDA issued a EUA for the emergency use of the Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for recipients 16 years of age or older.
On December 18, 2020, the FDA issued a EUA for the emergency use of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine for recipients 18 years of age or older.
On February 27, 2021, the FDA issued a EUA for the emergency use of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine (referred to as the Janssen vaccine) for recipients 18 years of age or older.
Each EUA for the three emergencies authorized COVID-19 vaccines was issued in conjunction with a similar Fact Sheet from the FDA.
For example, the Janssen fact sheet contains the following notice: INFORMATION TO PROVIDE TO VACCINE RECIPIENTS/CAREGIVERS As the vaccination provider, you must communicate to the recipient or their caregiver information consistent with the “Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers” (and provide a copy or direct the individual to the website www.janssencovid19vaccine.com to obtain the Fact Sheet) prior to the individual receiving the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, including • FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, which is not an FDA-approved vaccine. • The recipient or their caregiver has the option to accept or refuse the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.
While I am not an attorney, I understand that [COMPANY NAME] is not in the medical field and should not be giving medical advice.
Please be aware that anyone involved in forced vaccinations could violate the Nuremberg Code. For your convenience, the Nuremberg Code located directly on the National Institute of Health website states:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Thus, any attempt to force an employee to take a COVID-19 vaccine is contrary to federal law and the conditions under which the COVID-19 vaccine has been authorized for use. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, YOUR MANDATE GOES AGAINST THE NUREMBERG CODE. Now that you have been informed of the Nuremberg Code by Certified Letter, you, your employees, and anyone else associated with your company pushing forced vaccination could stand trial in a Tribunal.
The Health Freedom Defense Fund urges U.S. employers to comply with the FD&C Act and the terms of the EUA and its accompanying Fact Sheet and advise all employees that they have the right to refuse to take any COVID-19 vaccine. Any other course of action is contrary to federal law and Nuremberg Code.
Sincerely,
[SIGN YOUR NAME WITH YOUR EMPLOYEE NUMBER AND OTHER DATA TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF]
